Author Topic: The "REDNECK" Threat  (Read 5347 times)

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7225
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 833
The "REDNECK" Threat
« on: November 22, 2008, 03:10:27 PM »
I keep hearing bovine scatology rolling from the lips of people hoping some errant REDNECK does not go after BHO and start pandomonium....stating the fear like there is a fact behind the belief that REDNECKS are always THE issue and THE problem.  It is a somewhat misguided and condescending statement of not much factual basis to fear the REDNECK who basically wants to be left alone. 

Safety is a worthy desire and should be guaranteed for the president-elect....but fear of the threat coming from a REDNECK appears inconsistent with history here and abroad.  Who whacked Kennedy, made a run at Ford in a crowd, injured Reagan, et.al...how many "REDNECKS" compared to activest left-wingers, Marxists & looney tuners?

I think it is more consistent with history to be fearful of, and to watch for, THE political left to do something injurous and stupid. 

Also, since when are constitutional conservatives the equivalent of right-wing despots?  We've been linked to some real looney tunes and we should not let baseless statements and comparisons go unchallenged in polite conversation.

The above misconceptions are used to slander the RKBA.







Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

runstowin

  • Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just”
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 886
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2008, 03:16:01 PM »
Where did I go wrong? I thought Sirhan Sirhan was a Confederate war flag, beer drinking, uneducated, racist redneck.
Rights are like muscles, when they are not exercised they atrophy.

ericire12

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7926
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2008, 03:17:22 PM »
Redneck = Race card
Everything I needed to learn in life I learned from Country Music.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2008, 03:27:31 PM »

One of the tenant that runs through liberal thinking is that "the end justifies the means".   So the left would easily justify assassinating one of their own if they perceived an improved benefit to their position.

Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2008, 03:49:33 PM »
Where did I go wrong? I thought Shirhan Sirhan was a Confederate war flag, beer drinking, uneducated, racist redneck.

By putting 2 H's in the first Sirhan  ;D

I copied this from the "Matt Coleman" thread, it's a post I put up last night:

On MB's podcast this week, he again refers to a conversation he had with a "Gay Rights" activist who said," The secret is to get out of the closet and into the streets", he went on to say that if Gays had the kind of numbers that gun owners do the would rule the planet. The message being that we as members of the gun culture can let nothing slide, calling you a "gun nut" is the same sort of "hate crime" as calling Liberace a "faggot", or calling a black person anything that starts with the letter "N" (unless he is from Nigeria)
When media outlets mention Gun owners in ANY terms other than as "law abiding Citizens"we should picket that establishment, when towns consider gun laws we need to be there IN MASS accusing them of DISCRIMINATION, they are after all infringing our Civil rights. Take several pages from the Gay rights movement, Do NOT limit yourself to picketing establishments, media, and hearings, picket the HOMES of company and local officials. Button hole their relatives, walk up to an anti gun reporter or selectman's Wife in a public place and ask "How do you feel about your Husbands attempts to make the world safe for rapists  ? Is he doing it to protect himself ?"
These tactics may be distasteful to people like us, we prefer not to draw attention to our selves, but THEY WORK ! You may not approve of homosexuals, but I bet you are DAMNED careful where you say so nowadays. We have been writing letters to the Editor and to our representatives for 50 + years and it has not been enough, We MUST take the offensive. Would you rather feel like an ass chanting a slogan and carrying a sign outside city hall or the local newspaper, or wait until our only option is ambushing "Confiscation convoys" ?  Yeah , I know, but posters are a lot cheaper than ammo these days and you don't get the death penalty for being a pain in the ass.    ;D

Adding this,
Many people hear the term "Redneck" and think of  a Moonshine swilling, uneducated, cousin f@#$ing, klan joining , hick, outside the south the word is taken as another term for "white trash", and the neo nazi, white supremacist , skinhead movement fits that description. So far both of the groups arrested for planning to whack B Ho have fallen into this category as they intended to kill him for his skin color, not his political leanings.

PS, Personally I understand that the term ACTUALLY refers to some one who works out doors and therefore has his neck burned red by the sun.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #5 on: Today at 06:05:25 PM »

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6450
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2008, 06:58:23 PM »
Right, and Lee Harvey Oswald was such a cracker that he . . . .

Wait, no, he was a Marxist.

IMNSHO I think this publicity is prelude to an attack on bho, probably by one of bho's own, laying the groundwork for people to "believe" the Feds story. Then they can put some law into place fast (remember how long it took to develop and prepare the so-called "Patriot Act" after 9/11? What was it, 1500 pages in 2-3 days? Riiiight) which basically bans everything, using the death of this "beloved" president as an excuse to ratchet down what's left of our rights after the "Patriot" Act.

I would hate to be a Secret Service agent about now. And not just because of the way the klintoons were alleged to have treated them (badly, very badly) - and one can expect that Harvard-educated 1st lady in waiting to be even rougher on them. Anyone want to guess how long before she calls one of them "boy"?

I seriously hope no one does anything to make this happen. We don't need that, but apparently USA Today made the case that "we're due" since it has been forty-some years since JFK was shot. And the civil unrest in the urban areas will made Rodney King's riots look like a walk in the park.

But I am concerned that if we are circumspect and disciplined, preferring to use the law to protect and enforce our rights, the leftists will do something and blame us. It's not the leftists have never done that. Let's see, Trotsky, more millions under Lenin, about 30 million under Stalin, another 30 or so millions under Mao, Hitler did away with Roehm and his whole SA infrastructure, not to mention about 10 million others, etc. etc. etc.
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2008, 08:34:59 PM »
.... And the civil unrest int he urban areas will made Rodney King's riots look like a walk in the park.

And who would benefit from this the most?  The left would use it as a spring board to trounce all over civil liberties.  From throttling talk radio, to controlling the Internet, not to mention gun control.

If I were bHO I know who I'd keep close so I can keep an eye on them.......Oh, he's doing that.
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

TexGun

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2008, 09:04:47 PM »
And who would benefit from this the most?  The left would use it as a spring board to trounce all over civil liberties.  From throttling talk radio, to controlling the Internet, not to mention gun control.

If I were bHO I know who I'd keep close so I can keep an eye on them.......Oh, he's doing that.

yup...So much for "change".

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7225
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 833
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2008, 10:43:23 PM »
Right, and Lee Harvey Oswald was such a cracker that he . . . .

Wait, no, he was a Marxist.

IMNSHO I think this publicity is prelude to an attack on bho, probably by one of bho's own, laying the groundwork for people to "believe" the Feds story. Then they can put some law into place fast (remember how long it took to develop and prepare the so-called "Patriot Act" after 9/11? What was it, 1500 pages in 2-3 days? Riiiight) which basically bans everything, using the death of this "beloved" president as an excuse to ratchet down what's left of our rights after the "Patriot" Act.

I would hate to be a Secret Service agent about now. And not just because of the way the klintoons were alleged to have treated them (badly, very badly) - and one can expect that Harvard-educated 1st lady in waiting to be even rougher on them. Anyone want to guess how long before she calls one of them "boy"?

I seriously hope no one does anything to make this happen. We don't need that, but apparently USA Today made the case that "we're due" since it has been forty-some years since JFK was shot. And the civil unrest in the urban areas will made Rodney King's riots look like a walk in the park.

But I am concerned that if we are circumspect and disciplined, preferring to use the law to protect and enforce our rights, the leftists will do something and blame us. It's not the leftists have never done that. Let's see, Trotsky, more millions under Lenin, about 30 million under Stalin, another 30 or so millions under Mao, Hitler did away with Roehm and his whole SA infrastructure, not to mention about 10 million others, etc. etc. etc.

You said that very well.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: The "REDNECK" Threat
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2008, 11:04:40 PM »
Right, and Lee Harvey Oswald was such a cracker that he . . . .

Wait, no, he was a Marxist.

IMNSHO I think this publicity is prelude to an attack on bho, probably by one of bho's own, laying the groundwork for people to "believe" the Feds story. Then they can put some law into place fast (remember how long it took to develop and prepare the so-called "Patriot Act" after 9/11? What was it, 1500 pages in 2-3 days? Riiiight) which basically bans everything, using the death of this "beloved" president as an excuse to ratchet down what's left of our rights after the "Patriot" Act.

I would hate to be a Secret Service agent about now. And not just because of the way the klintoons were alleged to have treated them (badly, very badly) - and one can expect that Harvard-educated 1st lady in waiting to be even rougher on them. Anyone want to guess how long before she calls one of them "boy"?

I seriously hope no one does anything to make this happen. We don't need that, but apparently USA Today made the case that "we're due" since it has been forty-some years since JFK was shot. And the civil unrest in the urban areas will made Rodney King's riots look like a walk in the park.

But I am concerned that if we are circumspect and disciplined, preferring to use the law to protect and enforce our rights, the leftists will do something and blame us. It's not the leftists have never done that. Let's see, Trotsky, more millions under Lenin, about 30 million under Stalin, another 30 or so millions under Mao, Hitler did away with Roehm and his whole SA infrastructure, not to mention about 10 million others, etc. etc. etc.

Pathfinder, You are looking at this wrong way to, let them riot, it gives REAL AMERICANS the chance in self defense, to shoot large numbers of the people who voted this Racist, lying socialist turd into office.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk