As much as I hate to say it, these days I'm starting to support manditory training. Not just for LEOs and Military, but for civilans too. IMO if they buy the ar's they should have maybe 15-20hrs of initial training then 5hrs a week for the following weeks. As for civilians I would like it if there was a maniditory course that was taken before they could perchase a handgun or get a ccw permit. Now don't get me wrong I really don't want to put in place a bunch of stupid laws that will hinders people's ability to obtain legal firearms, but I don't want to be able to trust the people around me with a firearm especially if those people are there to protect me and mine. I would not support the idea if I didn't think that it was necissary since I was taught how to shoot safely and effectively when I was about 4-5 years old, but the matter of the fact is that there are quite a few people that want to carry a gun just because they can. They don't know how to properly use the gun and they don't make the effort to learn on their own. Like I said that's just MO, and beings that I'm one of the youngest members I know that I don't know as much on this subject as most.
The biggest problem with 'mandatory' training beyond what is given to LEO's goes right back to the heart of this thread, MONEY.
Many agencies can't afford the weaponry, let alone extra, much needed training. I was at the range a few weeks back and some state officers were going trough some practice runs for their up-coming qualifications. My friend (range owner) is a state officer and firearms instructor and he was running the drills. They were having to use their own privately bought ammo so round count was critical for them. Some had no worries, but a couple were borderline and could have used a few hundred more rounds to boost their confidence for the qualification shoot.
Many LEO's are not 'gun folks' and only use them for 'the job'. Many have no interest in training beyond what they get on the job. My B-I-L is one of these types. He only shoots at the pre-qualification warm-up and to qualify. This is one area where mandatory training would be beneficial but cost prohibitive for most departments.
Private citizens are a whole different tater patch. It is very true that many who carry do so only because they can. However, requiring mandatory training as a condition of ownership or even to CCW would serve to open up a whole new can of bureaucratic red tape that we don't need.
Do LEO's need more training? Yes.
Do many citizens need more training? Yes.
Is making it mandatory the way to go? I say no (JMHO)..but I've been wrong before.
