Author Topic: For the Glockoholics  (Read 5053 times)

Badgersmilk

  • Guest
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2011, 02:55:50 PM »
That time of the month, princess?

BURRNN!  ;D ;D ;D

Sorry quacker, that shi# was FUNNY!  

Ping

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Glock Certified Armorer & NRA Certified Instructor
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2011, 06:07:03 PM »
Really cool if you have $1,500 to burn. Chunk of change in my book. That price is another AR-15 and another Glock...

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2011, 06:55:59 PM »
I wonder how long that C-More will stay on that slide before the glass falls out of it?  Bill T.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2011, 07:40:03 PM »
Read the article and find out.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2011, 05:01:35 AM »
Read the article and find out.

They haven't had trouble....yet. That really is no guarantee. Besides, I can't see any advantage to optical electronic sights on a pure combat handgun. Especially if it is mounted to the slide where it will receive heavy shock every time the gun is fired. If I were to go to something of that nature, a rail mounted Laser would seen a better choice when you consider the ranges these type of guns are employed at.  Bill T.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #15 on: Today at 02:49:24 AM »

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: For the Glockoholics
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2011, 11:37:25 AM »
I'm not comfortable with electronic sights of any sort to begin with simply because I don't trust batteries.
That being said, I would reject both in favor of guide rod laser. They seem to have the least impact on the guns shape and balance.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk