Freedom under fire (CNN)

[Teresa Heilevang]

I'll just bring a cooler of beer, you bring the chips and salsa, we both bring our guns, ammo, targets.
I'll leave Marshal'ette at home and we'll just have a hell of a good time.
Sound good to you?

That idea stinks!

[Hazcat]

Actually, the way the laws are jerry-rigged these days, as someone once said, a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. The reality is, that if a technical infraction of the law has occurred, it is pretty black and white, and an anti-gun judge can pretty much send the case where he/she wants it.

Besides, the American people have a tendency, much exploited these days by the various levels of gummint, to blindly obey the law, and believe the "law" protectors, that they will not apply any reasoning to the case, such as, "Should this case even have been brought to trial?".

Study up on the concept of jury nullification, and learn it!

It may come in handy some day. Judges hate anyone who knows of it, as it prevents them from controlling the process. There was even a study here in ND that "proved" there is no legal basis or right to nullification. No, no basis or right, only about 700 years of common law. But the legal (not justice) system does not want us amateurs meddling in their power base.

Here's a good link on what a jury can do.

http://www.fija.org/

[Outlaw]

Well Marshall, now you went and dunnit! Ya got the misses pissed. Woa be unto you my man. No wrath like the scorn of a woman. Or something like that.   Especially if you live with her....DOOOOOOP!

[Marshal Halloway]

    

I never learn.........