Author Topic: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?  (Read 6671 times)

CJS3

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2010, 10:13:41 PM »
I wonder why the company names weren't mentioned? I wonder how many of the companies have big fat contracts with the US gov?
Children, pets, and slaves are taken care of. Free Men take care of themselves.

jaybet

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3773
  • NRA Life Member, DRTV Ranger, Guitar Player
    • Bluebone- Burnin' and Smokin'
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2010, 10:25:42 PM »
First, arresting these guys at SHOT makes sense. They are all at the same place and it got every other company's undivided attention. Fair enough. Thing is though, I'm iffy on the law itself. From an FP position it makes good sense. Problem is though, that in a lot of foriegn countries (and Florida) its a pay to play system. If companies from other countries can offer payola and US companies can't, we'll lose every time. If something like this happens, it should be in the form of a treaty where major players in the arms trade like China, France Russia and Israel agree to pass similar laws. Otherwise it seems like we're making a fashion statement at the expense of reality.
FQ13
Yes this is all true...but it wasn't a bust of dealings with a foreign country, it was a STING. The federal government set out to ENTRAP these "undesireables" with a (most likely) irresistable deal, and have now locked them up for doing what our own government has been doing for years with foreign countries: making shady deals. But it's not even a shady deal!!!
It's an OBAMA CRANK BAIT that they all bit on! This is BS. Of course the little dictators and the cabinet guys get their cut...how many of them are being greased right now by our own government? But Bho can't get them one way, he'll get them another.
I got the blues as my companion.

www.bluebone.net

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10234
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2010, 10:37:40 PM »
Aresting them at shot makes perfect sense.

1 they are all there, so there is very little chance of the word getting out and them fleeing.

2 sends a very strong message to the industry.

I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

GUNS-R-US

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 748
  • We must protect & defend our freedoms!
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2010, 11:18:00 PM »
I have a had time believing 22 different companies would be in together on something like this. ???
Mike Kramer
NRA "Benefactor" Life Member 
2AF Life Member

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2010, 02:17:36 AM »
First, arresting these guys at SHOT makes sense. They are all at the same place and it got every other company's undivided attention. Fair enough. Thing is though, I'm iffy on the law itself. From an FP position it makes good sense. Problem is though, that in a lot of foriegn countries (and Florida) its a pay to play system. If companies from other countries can offer payola and US companies can't, we'll lose every time. If something like this happens, it should be in the form of a treaty where major players in the arms trade like China, France Russia and Israel agree to pass similar laws. Otherwise it seems like we're making a fashion statement at the expense of reality.
FQ13

The problem is that ever since Boeing got in trouble with Korea, it's been established law that "Payola" violates US law.
One of the companies I worked for years ago made us all sit through a class on Business ethics, the basic rule of thumb was play it by the book because seemingly small things can have major consequences.
Example, You've been doing a lot of work with Mr. X over the years and have gotten to know his family, You give his wife a set of earrings for her birthday. 2 weeks later His company signs another contract with yours. An investigator could present the "Birthday Present" as buying influence.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 12:25:27 PM »

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2010, 08:27:44 AM »
I wonder why the company names weren't mentioned? I wonder how many of the companies have big fat contracts with the US gov?

My guess is that, at this time, they have no proof this was with the company's approval or knowledge and thus are only prosecuting the individual and protecting the name of the assumed innocent company.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

Woody

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2010, 11:05:47 AM »
 This ammo for the U.N. Arms treaty, watch your rights gun owners.

Paraguy

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 372
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #17 on: January 20, 2010, 11:12:24 AM »
Those Executives should have renamed themselves "Lobbyists" so what they were doing would be legal.  The difference between bribing officials and lobbying is like the difference between a "cemetary" and a "marble orchard" - one just sounds better than the other but at the end of the day they are the same thing.
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.

ratcatcher55

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2010, 12:02:58 PM »
I attended an ITAR course last year that was pretty interesting.

Big loser was ITT. They gave away (gifts) 4th gen night vision google to folks without proper export license.
Total fine in 2007 was $100 million.

The strange thing about this the criiminal invetigation is that it's usually run by DCIS, State, Commerce or ICE. The warrants are served by the US Marshals. The FBI normally works on this stuff only if there is espionage involved.

I think this is grandstanding to the gunmakers by AG Holder. Message delivered by the FEBE's

tt11758

  • Noolis bastardis carborundum (Don't let the bastards wear you down)
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5821
  • DRTV Ranger ~
    • 10-Ring Firearms Training
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: SHOT SHOW SHOCKER? ? ?
« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2010, 12:05:05 PM »
BTW: Anyone heard from M'ette lately ??? ;D ;D ;D

We exchanged some texts about an hour ago that ended with her telling me to hang it in my ass.
I love waking up every morning knowing that Donald Trump is President!!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk