First, arresting these guys at SHOT makes sense. They are all at the same place and it got every other company's undivided attention. Fair enough. Thing is though, I'm iffy on the law itself. From an FP position it makes good sense. Problem is though, that in a lot of foriegn countries (and Florida) its a pay to play system. If companies from other countries can offer payola and US companies can't, we'll lose every time. If something like this happens, it should be in the form of a treaty where major players in the arms trade like China, France Russia and Israel agree to pass similar laws. Otherwise it seems like we're making a fashion statement at the expense of reality.
FQ13
The problem is that ever since Boeing got in trouble with Korea, it's been established law that "Payola" violates US law.
One of the companies I worked for years ago made us all sit through a class on Business ethics, the basic rule of thumb was play it by the book because seemingly small things can have major consequences.
Example, You've been doing a lot of work with Mr. X over the years and have gotten to know his family, You give his wife a set of earrings for her birthday. 2 weeks later His company signs another contract with yours. An investigator could present the "Birthday Present" as buying influence.