Author Topic: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K  (Read 7776 times)

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2010, 05:36:08 PM »
HK made a SOCOM pistol available to the military years ago, I guess they finally got a big enough "fish/squids" to get the whole enchilada...



Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10258
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 105
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2010, 06:14:30 PM »
The seals can basicly use what ever they want, a 45 packs alot more punch and sub sonic speeds then a 9x19 does.   
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

garand4life

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 797
    • My Blog
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2010, 06:16:05 PM »
Is there any reason to switch... really? What about the whole load of crap about military contracts only going to companies that produce the product here in the US? Sig built an entire facility here to meet that requirement. What is HK going to do?
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
"If you know your enemy is bringing a gun to the fight, bring 2..."
http://www.youtube.com/natetinstman  -
Save $10 on your NRA membership by going to http://garand4life.wordpress.com

Neon Knight Anubis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 408
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2010, 08:22:35 PM »
Its only a supplemental weapon, like the SOCOM Mk 23. The main battle pistol is still the P226. Also, the HK 45 was designed predominantly by Larry Vickers and is being produced by the American branch of HK.

SEALS have also been known to use 357 revolvers as a sidearm on occasion, particularly missions that require prolonged time underwater.
We'll know for the first time
If we're evil or divine
We're the last in line

MikeO

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 169
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2010, 01:35:50 PM »
IIRC, NCIS has or is in the process of switching from the 9mm M11 to the SIG P229 in 40S&W.

There are plenty of holes in the Buy America Act to drive HKs, SIGs, Berettas, etc through. For contracting purposes, all their US operations are considered "American" companies.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:03:34 PM »

Kilroy

  • Active Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
  • JAFMP
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2010, 09:32:35 PM »
...replacing the SIG P226 for personnel in certain roles.

The title is a bit misleading.  "..certain roles." speaks to mission specific needs.  The article should not be interpreted to actually mean that the Navy dropped Sig.
Kilroy...

...was here.

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2010, 12:38:10 AM »
And here is where I wipe the Kool-aid from my lips and reccomend a Glock in .45. Monkey simple, cheap, proven in every PD world wide, and goes bang every time. Honestly, the average squid will never see combat. They'll be part of the the 3000 plus crew that keeps 200 aviators in the air. They should be be drilled on wrench work, not pistol marksmanship. (And no Tim, thats not a slam, just an aknowledgement that a carrier jet jockey  ain't worth crap wtihout a carrier to land on).Someone has to take care of the boat and the planes. Still, the idea of a handgun is to be  simple, reliable, and accurate enough  to do the job inside of 25 yards. Idiot proofed in every way possible. This seems to describe Glock to a T. No one's first choice for anything, but good enough for everything. Just like a Reminton 870 or an AK, good enough for what it's for, and stone ax  simple. Issue these in .45 and I see no problems.
FQ13

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2010, 10:17:22 AM »
Tom, you know we don't got no mo' Battleships in commision........Big MO was the last I think!

But your point is well taken.......

I did not know that.  And I'd like to know the reasons...not that I disagree with it...I just want to understand the changing face of warfare?

Were they 'sitting ducks' for air and missile attacks?  Was their mission better met by other resources?  Too slow to respond?

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2010, 10:23:32 AM »
I did not know that.  And I'd like to know the reasons...not that I disagree with it...I just want to understand the changing face of warfare?

Were they 'sitting ducks' for air and missile attacks?  Was their mission better met by other resources?  Too slow to respond?


They are nothing but a floating artillery platform. Anything a battleship can do, carrier launched aircraft and Tomahawk equiped destroyers can do, and from a longer range and with greater precision. The exception would seem to be softening up a landing beach.
FQ13

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Navy drops Sig and goes H&K
« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2010, 10:48:42 AM »
They were to big and expensive, after the advent of the Air Craft Carrier the Battleships day was done.
Their only real purpose was to sink other battleships, and when the day of the "Fleet action" died so did their purpose.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk