Author Topic: China. Threat or rival? (forget strategic partner)  (Read 1278 times)

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
China. Threat or rival? (forget strategic partner)
« on: March 27, 2010, 12:18:57 AM »
Its 1am and I am both awake and bored (always a dangerous combinationn). Anyway I am about halfway through Mahan's "The Influence of Sea Power Upon History". A great (though tedious), read and one that influenced TR to build "The Geat White Fleet" and has dictated CINCPAC strategy since it was written in 1890. The summary is this. Nations with naval power succeed in projecting power, those without don't. The Chinese don't have a blue water navy, and they never have. This has been their fatal flaw from the days of Ghenghis Khan.The PLAN is buying shiny toys, but the PLA is still focused on missles aimed at Taipei. Do they want to project power locally or globally? Do they want to just dominate the Pacific or world wide? Are they pursuing a military or economic strategy for doing so? Thoughts?
FQ13

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: China. Threat or rival? (forget strategic partner)
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2010, 08:15:24 AM »
Its 1am and I am both awake and bored (always a dangerous combinationn). Anyway I am about halfway through Mahan's "The Influence of Sea Power Upon History". A great (though tedious), read and one that influenced TR to build "The Geat White Fleet" and has dictated CINCPAC strategy since it was written in 1890. The summary is this. Nations with naval power succeed in projecting power, those without don't. The Chinese don't have a blue water navy, and they never have. This has been their fatal flaw from the days of Ghenghis Khan.The PLAN is buying shiny toys, but the PLA is still focused on missles aimed at Taipei. Do they want to project power locally or globally? Do they want to just dominate the Pacific or world wide? Are they pursuing a military or economic strategy for doing so? Thoughts?
FQ13

I'd say China is a threat.

During the Shock and Awe of the 2nd Gulf War, China was duly impressed by our military technology....to the extent that they realized a toe-to-toe military conflict with the US was a no-win undertaking.

Since that time, they have sought other means of attack.  The incident of Internet attacks from China expanded soon after the war.  They are probing for weakness in our Internet, Communications and Power Grid infrastructure.

Infiltration into political positions and other positions of influence or control have been suggested.

I have been told that the influx of Western Business will make it impossible for them to cut ties with the West.

Well, I know that finding McDonalds usually indicates the End of Life as We Know It in most places, but somehow I think the regime in China will manage to quell the citizens taste for McChopSuey in order to achieve their military goals.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: China. Threat or rival? (forget strategic partner)
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2010, 10:43:26 AM »
Mahon is like Clausewitz, He presented some well reasoned ideas, but his writings were, and are, given more weight than they deserve. Two specifics, first, many of his theories revolve around the contemporary need for a world wide network of coaling stations that  has been rendered obsolete .
Secondly even in his own time 4 of the major powers had little if anything in the way of real naval power (Germany, Austria Hungary, Ottoman Empire, and Russia,) and while France considers itself to still be a "World Power" it's fleet has not been a factor in world affairs since Napoleon's day, yet both France and Germany maintained colonies around the world while the Ottomans ruled an area that extended from the borders of Afghanistan to the Atlantic coast of Africa.

China ?  It's my opinion that they wish to dominate the world economically while maintaining a military that is capable of both, local domination to the East, South, West, and internally, while also being able to defend against any moves by the Russians to the North.
China's primary reason for the military modernization of the last 30 years is the lousy performance of the PLA in their 1979 operations on the Vietnamese border.
If Red China, and Formosa are ever reunited it will be common interest not military force that decides the issue.
When you get done with Mahon there is still Douhet  (Sp ? ) "On Air power"

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China. Threat or rival? (forget strategic partner)
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2010, 12:29:55 PM »
They haven't bent the U.S. over quite far enough yet for the real reaming they would love to give to us. But China has always been patient, and economically getting higher up the ladder than the rest of the world.

He who has the gold makes the rules......As the EU is going broke, our country is broke, the rest are just chump change, China is a threat, and Russia is a close second.

Kinda gives you those warm fuzzies doesn't it???
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk