Author Topic: SCOTUS  (Read 3031 times)

ellis4538

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3455
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
SCOTUS
« on: April 04, 2010, 07:14:56 AM »
Just heard that O'bummer will get another pick for Justice of the US Supreme Court.  Didn't hear who is retiring but that he gets to stack the deck against us!  Sorry to be the bearer of bad news today of all days.

Richard
Used to be "The only thing to FEAR was FEAR ITSELF", nowadays "The only thing to FEAR is GETTING CAUGHT!"

BAC

  • Guest
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2010, 07:23:06 AM »
It's Stevens.  No big change there.

Fatman

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2010, 07:41:35 AM »
And there's always the chance the 'lib' he appoints pulls a Souter.
Anti: I think some of you gentleman would choose to apply a gun shaped remedy to any problem or potential problem that presented itself? Your reverance (sic) for firearms is maintained with an almost religious zeal. The mind boggles! it really does...

Me: Naw, we just apply a gun-shaped remedy to those extreme life threatening situations that call for it. All the less urgent problems we're willing to discuss.

Hazcat

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10457
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2010, 07:52:44 AM »
Unfortunately, Fatman I have never seen a lib change its stripes. At most they pass themselves off as center left and then show their true colors after getting the job.
All tipoes and misspelings are copi-righted.  Pleeze do not reuse without ritten persimmons  :D

Timothy

  • Guest
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2010, 08:32:33 AM »
Haven't heard the timing yet, has he picked a date?

It would be interesting if the 112th Congress goes back to the right!  All the committee chairs have to switch to the majority...

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #5 on: Today at 05:47:40 AM »

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7342
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 888
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2010, 08:33:02 AM »
Unfortunately, Fatman I have never seen a lib change its stripes. At most they pass themselves off as center left and then show their true colors after getting the job.

Good observation Haz.  Seems as though there are some liars in the Supreme Court.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11007
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1175
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2010, 11:26:28 AM »
Yahoo News is reporting that it will be this year or next, but definitely during Obummer's term.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100404/ap_on_go_su_co/us_supreme_court_stevens

WASHINGTON – A leading Democratic senator hopes Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens doesn't decide to retire this year.

The 89-year-old Stevens says he "will surely" step down during Barack Obama's presidency, and will decide soon whether it's this year or next.

Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., worries that a nomination fight this year would mean gridlock in the partisan Senate. Specter thinks there's a better chance for consensus next year.

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6451
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2010, 11:40:41 AM »
Sen. Kyl Fires First Shot in Battle Over Next Supreme Court Nominee

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/04/sen-kyl-fires-shot-battle-supreme-court-nominee/

The battle over the next Supreme Court justice is already under way, as the No. 2 Republican in the Senate on Sunday would not rule out blocking a successor to Justice John Paul Stevens -- who said in interviews published this weekend his retirement is on the horizon.

Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., speaking on "Fox News Sunday," warned President Obama not to try nominating anyone "overly ideological" to replace Stevens, who is known as the leader of the liberal wing of the court.

He suggested the party did not want anyone so outspoken as Sonia Sotomayor, who was picked to replace former Justice David Souter last year, and said the decision on whether the GOP will filibuster will "all depend" on who the next nominee is.

"I think the president will nominate a qualified person. I hope, however, he does not nominate an overly ideological person. That will be the test," Kyl said. "And if he doesn't nominate someone who is overly ideological, I don't think -- you may see Republicans voting against the nominee, but I don't think you'll see them engage in a filibuster."

He said Republicans would only filibuster under "extraordinary circumstances," the standard agreed to after a series of clashes in Congress over judicial nominees under former President George W. Bush.
related links

At least one Democrat is taking Kyl's threats seriously.

Stevens told The Washington Post he "will surely" retire while Obama is still president. But Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., told "Fox News Sunday" he hopes Stevens will wait until next year to do it, when the politics in Congress would potentially be a bit less toxic.

"I think the gridlock in the Senate might well produce a filibuster, which would tie up the Senate on a Supreme Court nominee," Specter said. "I think if a year passes there's a much better chance we can come to a consensus."

Specter, who said he doesn't want to see any more Circuit Court judges elevated to the high court -- at least not this time -- said he has a nominee in mind for whom he will lobby Obama on Monday.

Specter said he wants a nominee who is "tough" on executive power. But Kyl said that's exactly the kind of pick his party wants to avoid.

"I want a judge who will read the law and declare it in each case that comes before him or her as it should be," Kyl said, adding that "preconceived attitudes" have no place on the bench.

"We've had too much of that," he said, in what appeared to be a veiled reference to the last nominee, Sotomayor.
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7342
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 888
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2010, 08:05:21 PM »
It would be good for the liberal to step down and there be gridlock.  The court would have to decide with one less liberal and what is bad about that?
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk