I had a Kel Tec P-11 and while it fit my hand perfectly, the triiger was so stiff that I kept missing the 8" target at 5 yards where as I could get groups with the Colt. It was very frustrating because the P-11 was going to be my "all around" defense gun. Now my S&W is my "house gun".
That stinks about reloads being percieved as "bad" in court. You'd think that a decent defense lawyer would be able to successfully argue that the reloads have less powder in them than factory .38 special rounds and that the bulltes themselves are the exact same ones that the factories use in their defensive rounds.
The reason why I don't want to go with a .32 or .327 is to try and avoid adding yet another caliber to the list. (.22lr, .22 mag, .38 short colt, .38 Special, .357 magnum, 380, 9 mill, and 30-30) As you know the .38Special will fit in my .357 so I can use that as a sub at the range and when I finally get into reloading (one day) I can cut down the brass of the specials to short colt size.
Now the .38 snubbie seems like a good idea, but I'm not sold yet. I like the "J-Frame" size, but I definitely want the barrel a tad longer. (Blame Sherrif Jim Wilson and all his writings praising the 4" barrel as best for over-all use.) I've also hear many writers say that the J-frame snubbie "hurts" to shoot. (Massad Ayoob, Mike Venturino, and Michael Bane) In Fact, Mr. Bane opined in one of his podcasts how he and many others had switched from J- Frames to Ruger's LCP for ease of carry and better recoil.
So having a .38 with less recoil, yet good bullet mass sounds good to me. HAs anyone used "cowboy loads in their snubbie for self defense? With 158 grains and a energy of 200 ft/sec it is a step up and would still allow for fast repeat shots due to less recoil.