Author Topic: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A  (Read 5922 times)

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11004
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1160
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #20 on: May 15, 2010, 01:04:06 PM »

Understandable.  When I'm on a rant I tend to babble like a frickin idiot.   ;D

OK ... I'll just always assume you are on a rant, and we'll get along fine  ;)
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

tt11758

  • Noolis bastardis carborundum (Don't let the bastards wear you down)
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5821
  • DRTV Ranger ~
    • 10-Ring Firearms Training
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #21 on: May 15, 2010, 01:06:40 PM »
OK ... I'll just always assume you are on a rant, and we'll get along fine  ;)


If I didn't know you so well that might offend me.  Probably not, but you never know.  ;D
I love waking up every morning knowing that Donald Trump is President!!

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #22 on: May 15, 2010, 02:50:25 PM »

Understandable.  When I'm on a rant I tend to babble like a frickin idiot.   ;D

Just because you are up for VP, doesn't mean  you need to emulate your predecessor in any way  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #23 on: May 15, 2010, 02:52:54 PM »
Just because you are up for VP, doesn't mean  you need to emulate your predecessor in any way  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Any of them for the last 20 years. GHWB is fine, beyond that, you lose my vote. ;)
FQ13

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10230
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2010, 07:25:32 AM »
she did teach law and harvard...


I think that pretty much says it all.


I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #25 on: Today at 07:27:42 PM »

Woody

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #25 on: May 25, 2010, 07:20:55 PM »
Kagan is a Goldman Sachs shill, soon we will have to disobey the SCOTUS!

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Kagan argued AGAINST 2A
« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2010, 01:59:55 AM »
Got some proof or are you just blowing smoke ?

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk