not when it comes to power generation. Dave has already made that point in this thread.
Lets just say for the sake of argument they do shut off the power, whats stoping the federal gov to revoke thier permit to produce/transmit/sell power? No big company is going to take that risk, there is just too much money at stake.
Tab,
I agree with you that they won’t because utilities are in the business of making money.
You need to sell power to somebody to pay the overhead of the plants.
But a couple of points:
California as a government has violated interstate commerce by banning its entities from doing business with Arizona without due process.
A utility could renegotiate a rate contract to provide power to a customer. They raise my rates when they want after a dog and pony show hearing.
The share holders could ask the utility not renew the contract especially if they found customers in other states, TX, NM, UT, and NV. If California utilities can not do not control 51% of the shares there is nothing they can do about it.
We did a security assessment for some plants and the number they gave us was that they earn about a million dollars an hour of production. You could pay a lot of fines with that, or pay a lot of legal fees to string out the process. You could say screw the fines. Closing the plants works to Arizona’s squeeze on California.
Could Uncle Sam seize the plants and run them? Yes, but that would ratchet things up to an even higher state of tension.
What would loosing a permit really due? Would the people of Arizona suddenly say those electrons don't have a the Federal Housekeeping Seal of Approval? The operators are suddenly incapable of throwing switches because DOE yanks a piece of paper?
Once again I agree with you but it's would be nice to see somebody stand up to the PC idiots.