Legal battle against Arizona’s law could become complicated

[Solus]

FQ and Solus are individually wrong. Together their replies dead on. Stop the hand outs AND the jobs.

And enforcement that makes it clear that entering illegally will hinder, if not void, any chance you have of legal entry.

[tt11758]

Just out of curiosity, if the courts rule the AZ law unconstitutional how long will it be before the USA is comprised of 49 states and a neighbor known as "The Republic of Arizona"?


One comment on the ACLU:  What kind of "civil rights defender" is willing to ignore the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution?.

Q)  How does the ACLU count to 10?
A)  1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.

[fightingquaker13]

Just out of curiosity, if the courts rule the AZ law unconstitutional how long will it be before the USA is comprised of 49 states and a neighbor known as "The Republic of Arizona"?


One comment on the ACLU:  What kind of "civil rights defender" is willing to ignore the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution?.

Q)  How does the ACLU count to 10?
A)  1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.

I think the ACLU, on balance, does more good than harm. Still, your math is wrong. They can only count to 8. 1,3,4,5,6,7,8. The 9th and 10th Ammendments aren't on their agenda either.
FQ13

[ericire12]

I think the ACLU, on balance, does more good than harm. Still, your math is wrong. They can only count to 8. 1,3,4,5,6,7,8. The 9th and 10th Ammendments aren't on their agenda either.
FQ13

In one thread you complain about everyone having to tip toe around for fear of litigation, and now you say that the ACLU does more good then harm. You cant even go one day without pissing all over yourself.

http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=12670.msg164150#msg164150

[fightingquaker13]

In one thread you complain about everyone having to tip toe around for fear of litigation, and now you say that the ACLU does more good then harm. You cant even go one day without pissing all over yourself.

http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=12670.msg164150#msg164150

I don't like them all that much either, hence my lukewarm endorsment. BUT, when it comes to defending civil liberties, there isn't any alternative in the game. Don't let the ideal become the enemy of the real.
FQ13

[Sponsor]

[ericire12]

I don't like them all that much either, hence my lukewarm endorsment. BUT, when it comes to defending civil liberties, there isn't any alternative in the game. Don't let the ideal become the enemy of the real.
FQ13

Yeah, and the Brady Organization is the best way to solve gun violence in this country


The fact is that they are an agenda driven organization that does do more harm then good. They do not defend our civil liberties, they cherry pick issues that they want to address and use the courts to further their "fundamental changes"

[Woody]

 Just don't hire them or any company that employees them. I'll choose a good American company every time over a band of criminals. I ask them: Is this company American owned?
                                               Do you employ Americans?
                                               Do you employ Illegals?
                                               Are you bonded and insured?
                                               Give me a bid, and I will verify your answers, and get back to you.
If they try the 'do it now and we'll give you a discount', I say see ya. Discounts= equal using un-professional or illegal workers. I don't want a discount from no-counts, I want to employ good American workers from the old school.
I've had several companies call me racist, which identifies them right off the bat. See ya!
I just tell them I'll be reporting then to ICE. They shut up an leave quickly. It's your money, use it wisely!

[tombogan03884]

I take it you have no bank account Woody.
Check out this video, LANGUAGE WARNING !
Bank of America got the most publicity but all banks do this :