Author Topic: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World  (Read 4319 times)

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The Muslim/Islamic culture, religion, and mindset has changed very little in hundreds of years, while our young country by comparison has a POTUS that touted "change".

Here's some "perspective" on what the flexibility of Islam, (or more realistically lack there of) is:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/why_we_cant_all_just_get_along.html

August 13, 2010
Why We Can't All Just Get Along

Jonathan David Carson
It would be nice to be able to just get along with the Muslim world. Unfortunately, mutual respect and tolerance is incompatible with characteristic aspects of Islam.

According to Bat Ye'or,  dhimmitude, which Islamists call "protection" of non-Muslims or "toleration," but which is more accurately called "subjugation," rests on three principles:
(1) "compulsory degradation"
(2) "differentiation"
(3) "segregation"
For instance, subject peoples are required to wear different clothes and live in different quarters, and they must ride donkeys, not horses and camels.  
One form of compulsory degradation is particularly relevant to the controversy over plans to build a "mega-mosque" near Ground Zero:
Some jurists recommend, while others -- and they are the majority -- state that it is compulsory to forbid infidels to have houses higher than their Muslim neighbors, even to have them of the same height.


Accordingly,  Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 1368) says that infidels "may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed."


This recommendation or compulsion applies with special force to houses of worship. Thus,
    Under Caliph Ma'mun (813-33), the Muslims of Jerusalem complained that the dome of the (Christian) Church of the Holy Sepulcher had been enlarged, making it higher than the (Islamic) Dome of the Rock.  The patriarch Thomas was cast in prison, but escaped flagellation and saved his dome on payment of a heavy ransom.

We can take from this that the prohibition of infidel houses and houses of worship higher than Islamic ones is not absolute: it can be waived as long as the principle of compulsory degradation is otherwise upheld.


Given this prohibition, we should not perhaps be too surprised that Islamic terrorists destroyed the lofty World Trade Center nor that Muslims now own the tallest building in the world, even if they had to pay for it with borrowed money and oil extracted by Western companies: it was designed by a Chicago firm and erected by Samsung--in Dubai.  There seems to have been no real economic basis for such a tall building, only a desire to overawe the infidels.


The three principles of dhimmitude demonstrate the difficulty of coexistence -- or even of dialogue
.  We complain about unfairness.  The Islamists think that there is supposed to be unfairness (degradation).  We complain about double standards; the Islamists think that there are supposed to be double standards (differentiation).  We say that we allow mosques here, but you won't allow churches and synagogues in Saudi Arabia.  The Islamists think that there aren't supposed to be any churches and synagogues there (segregation).

To all this, our craven ruling class says that we are opposed to the freedom of religion.
Apparently, telling the truth about dhimmitude or shariah law is a violation of the First Amendment.  And in a sense our critics are right: we cannot oppose Islam's opposition to freedom of other religions without opposing Islam itself, since Islam without opposition to freedom of other religions does not exist, has never existed, and probably never will exist.  See Bat Ye'Or or Andrew Bostom.  We can violate freedom of religion in the eyes of the ruling class by opposing the imposition of shariah law, or we can allow the Islamists to violate it.  One way or the other, it is gone.  We are in the same plight as Israelis, condemned around the world for building places to live.  We are all Israelis now.
******

We change, THEY DON'T.

just my .02 from another Infidel...
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2010, 12:20:03 PM »
Explain to me again why "Ethnic cleansing" and "Genocide" are bad things.

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2010, 03:09:30 PM »
Explain to me again why "Ethnic cleansing" and "Genocide" are bad things.

Perhaps a Jefferson vs. Barbary Pirate strategy?
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2010, 03:19:36 PM »
Perhaps a Jefferson vs. Barbary Pirate strategy?

It worked for 150 years, guess the need a "booster " like with your Tetanus shot.
I would suggest a healthy dose of the wonder drug U-235

Sponsor

  • Guest

bulldog75

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2010, 03:26:38 PM »
Lets see a Ohio class sub surfaces and sheethead countries turn to glass. You got my vote tom.
Citizens sleep peacfully at night knowing that rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf - George Orwell

sledgemeister

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1811
  • Democrat Sheeples
    • Australian Hunting Net
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2010, 04:27:56 PM »
It worked for 150 years, guess the need a "booster " like with your Tetanus shot.
I would suggest a healthy dose of the wonder drug U-235

Look they spent a lot of time and effort in inventing fission, seems bloody stupid not to explore all uses, just saying.
I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters. - Solomon Short

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2010, 05:17:32 PM »
WWRD?

What Would Reagan Do?

Gee,... perhaps we should ask Quadaffhi.

like sledge, just wondering when someone will step up, tell the UN to piss off, and deal with clear intentions to infiltrate and otherwise gain an unstoppable foothold here in the States,

Can we use Europe as a model? They accepted Muslims with open arms, and the last stat I read, is more mosques than churches in England.

Switzerland, wants and even FRANCE, wants SOME immigration policy that limits Islamic influence en mass,,,,,,

Hmmmm, reminds me of this.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrA_9SoCitk

Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

r_w

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 947
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2010, 07:44:28 PM »
TACTICAL BACON!!!!

"Why are you carrying a pistol?  Expecting trouble?"

"No Maam.  If I was expecting trouble, I'd have a rifle."

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: One Perspective On What We Just Don't Get With The Muslim World
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2010, 07:48:36 PM »
They hate us, there is not a single thing we can argue with them about, their religion forbids them to tolerate any one else.
The only practical solution is to beat them down to a manageable level, or exterminate them completely.
Any thing else is only a temporary fix.

Come to think of it, to them, this is just another round in that Barbary coast thing.
Jefferson showed the way.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk