Barack Obama is a politicianus

[jaybet]

The last thing I want is a politically active computer.

I don't know FQ, maybe a really smart computer could figure out which politician is lying the LEAST.

[rat31465]

I don't know FQ, maybe a really smart computer could figure out which politician is lying the LEAST.

Thats easy to do....Count how many words each candidate speaks in a minutes time...The one with the least is lying least.

[tombogan03884]

You are wrong Rat.
Obummer's biggest lie came in three words.





My fellow Americans.....

[rat31465]

Thats easy to do....Count how many words each candidate speaks in a minutes time...The one with the least is lying least.

I was speaking on Quantity of lies told and not quality.

[Teresa Heilevang]

I sent this Thread to some people...
Got this from Warph   as usual... he is is fine form.


 Excuse my "Big Wall Of Text" but....

Classless and godless, Voter X:  It seems as if this Clown cannot stand to utter any words he thinks might acknowledge a power higher than himself.  As I read various current  articles on Obuma, I keep wondering if those that voted for this Clown will spend any time in self reflection asking themselves why they were so easily led to the slaughter.  Why did they tune out or disparage all questioning of Obuma's past and the gaping hole of the lack of information about his past.  How is it that they turned a deaf ear or blind eye to the fact that for two decades he "worshiped" under the hate-filled Jeremiah Wright?  Does it not bother the masses that electing Obuma, how shallow their values have become, that all it took to sway them was his appearance and mindless, cheer leading chant of "hope and change"?   We have a battle between Truth and lies, deceit, fraud.  Deceit, by definition, takes portions of the truth and then distorts them, so that confusion ensues.  Most of us here remember with chagrin how many, many otherwise "intelligent" people succumbed to the razzle-dazzle of Obuma during the 2008 campaign.  One cringes with disgust in knowing that the Left MUST have an ignorant, pliable mass of people, the "motley rabble" as Nietzsche called them.  If Obuma, the "Constitutional scholar," can continue "mis-stating" documents, facts, truth, the "unquestioning" among us will soon be indoctrinated.  Sadly, hate to generalize, but... these people do not think, do not reason; they react emotionally, and emotions are easily roused.  
 
Obuma may be an empty-suit, with empty promises and an hollow rattling off of his mind-numbing tripe from a teleprompter... but he is not ignorant or unlearned... but he may very well be just plain stupid.  His speech writers use enough buzz-words and catch phrases to make you think you're hearing what you want, but only that.  The truth in his narration is there for the gleaning, if one looks close enough, as many previous posters have clearly identified.  Watch the u-tube video of his, stalling, lip-quivering, lizard-like delivery of his "Creator-Less" version.    Also, checkout the "In-Alienable" exchange, which totally alters the meaning.  Obuma uses "INalienable" rather than "UNalienable" when quoting the Declaration.  Many do this in error; Obuma can only be doing it deliberately... being the 'Constitutional scholar' and all.  In his original draft Jefferson used "INalienable". When Franklin and Adams reviewed it, they changed that descriptive term to "UNalienable", which became/is the term in final document.  Because Franklin and Adams changed it, and that change was incorporated into the final document which all signed, the Founders' intent shows a clarity abhorrent to Obuma with his "INalienable."  UNalienable rights... such as the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness endowed [given, provided] by our Creator... cannot be sold, taken, or given away to another; they are inherently OURS.  INalienable rights.... such as property ownership.... can be sold, transferred, or taken... such as by laws/government.INalienable rights are legally "transient."  UNalienable rights are our Founder's guarantee to each of us that the federal government must acknowledge and respect our sovereignty-of-self.  The Clowns substitution on INalienable for UNalienable is one more glaring example of his desire for our sovereignty-of-self to be usurped by his Marxist-goaled government.  Hitler did the same thing.  Subtle changes of words in speeches. Scary how close we are already.  As one democrat said, "Obuma? He ain't quite right in the head."  

To sum it up.... in this particular case, which has now been repeated on more than one occasion, it is the deliberate omission of certain words that mean things.  To me it means the Clown does not respect nor does he necessarily believe in the words that our forefathers used to describe the true nature of our God-given rights.  And this to me is cause for concern because it calls into question many other things about this person.  To quote George Orwell: "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."    There is no denying the truth that the words in "The Declaration" are the exact words used by our forefathers for all the world to see.  It was revolutionary then, and apparently, it is still revolutionary.

Stay alert and keep praying.

[Sponsor]