Author Topic: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama  (Read 3227 times)

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2011, 01:10:15 PM »
This was in a previous thread.
While I agree that Snopes is not trustworthy, ( I didn't know about the Soros money ) They will take one detail such as "I got this from so and so" and use it to discredit an entire item which is actually true.
That being said, the fact that Elana Kagan's name was on the docket is not exactly a "Smoking gun" of any wrong doing.
As the article stated, she was Solicitor General,  in effect, the head of the "law firm" that represents the Government.
It does not mean that she specifically has anything to do with a particular case, any more than you dealing with the Senior partner of your lawyers firm, they have a bunch of lawyers on the staff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solicitor_General_of_the_United_States

The United States Solicitor General is the person appointed to represent the Government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States. The most recent Solicitor General, Elena Kagan, was nominated to the Supreme Court and confirmed by the Senate in August 2010.[1] The Principal Deputy, Neal Katyal, is currently serving as Acting Solicitor General.[2]

The Solicitor General determines the legal position that the United States will take in the Supreme Court. In addition to supervising and conducting cases in which the government is a party, the Solicitor General's office also files amicus curiae briefs in cases in which the federal government has a significant interest in the legal issue. The Solicitor General's office argues on behalf of the government in virtually every case in which the United States is a party, and also argues in most of the cases in which the government has filed an amicus brief. In the federal courts of appeal, the Office of the Solicitor General reviews cases decided against the United States and determines whether the government will seek review in the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General's office also reviews cases decided against the United States in the federal district courts and approves every case in which the government files an appeal.
Composition of the Office of the Solicitor General

The Solicitor General is assisted by four Deputy Solicitors General and seventeen Assistants to the Solicitor General. Three of the deputies are career attorneys in the Department of Justice. The remaining deputy is known as the "Principal Deputy," sometimes called the "political deputy" and, like the Solicitor General, typically leaves at the end of an administration. The Principal Deputy currently is Neal Katyal. The other deputies currently are Michael Dreeben, Edwin Kneedler, and Malcolm Stewart.

The Solicitor General or one of the deputies typically argues the most important cases in the Supreme Court. Cases not argued by the Solicitor General may be argued by one of the assistants or another government attorney.


More at link

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2011, 01:24:37 PM »
Anything, or anyone for that matter, that is infected with a single dime of Soros money is going to be off the rails slanted left, and therefore totally unreliable in most anything they print. Snopes has for years been covering up Hussein's crap like a cat in a box. I suspect now, with Soros's vision of a socialist America fast falling apart, it will get worse. Desperate people do desperate things.  Bill T.

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2011, 01:34:22 PM »
I will not venture an opinion as to Snopes credibility. Just because you raise money from someone doesn't mean you know or endorse those views (I speak from the experience of a lot of university fundraising dinners. We don't run background checks, we just thank them for their support. Every non-profit in the world does the same.). This "smoking gun" is partly BS. As Tom said the SG is the government's lawyer. They have to take their side. Does every criminal defense/divorce/civil attorney think their client is in the right? No. That's not their job. They just argue the case. I'm not a Kagan fan. I just think this might be a tempest in a te pot.
FQ13

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2011, 05:35:01 PM »
If Snopes is receiving Soros funding, which it is, it cannot be trusted to be correct on anything involving negative press on Hussein. Everything Soros touches slants left. Way left. I personally don't care about the Kagen story. Finding out about the George Soros financial connection was enough for me.   Bill T.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama
« Reply #5 on: Today at 06:49:39 PM »

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10219
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: More Proof Not To Trust SNOPES On Anything Regarding Obama
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2011, 05:38:09 PM »
Ive never trusted them in the 1st place.


While they do have some good info, some of it is bad and some is wrong.

I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk