Author Topic: USPSA Coverage  (Read 8282 times)

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10995
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1140
USPSA Coverage
« on: January 21, 2011, 09:19:48 PM »
Michael,

Over the last couple years coverage of USPSA has really dropped off.  Shooting USA used to cover it very well, but they do very little any more.  They still cover some of the shooters, but the young horndogs spend all their time around Julie and Jessie.  I don't blame them, but isn't it their job to cover the events of shooting more than hitting on the babes?  When I shot the ProAm it was unbelievable the way they chased Julie and Jessie ... I didn't have to, because Julie was on my squad and Jessie was right behind, and they had their noses so far up B J's .... it was disgusting.  No one else seemed to matter.

What brings this up is that I received my new Front Sight today and a friend I have shot with is on the front cover.  I realized I had heard nothing about his rise through the ranks in the media until today.  Also, inside it is mentioned that Robbie Latham had knee surgery prior to the October event and is having another one this year.

Does Mr. Scoutton have this association locked up and hidden, or can we send Marshal over to slap the youngsters around and get some good coverage?
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

McGyver

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2011, 09:38:50 PM »
Send 'em! Them youngsters are sniffin' the wrong holes!  :'(
"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learnt something from yesterday."
On John Wayne's Tombstone

Michael Bane

  • Global Moderator
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1478
  • Host & Editor-in-chief
    • michaelBane.tv
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2011, 10:43:11 AM »
This is a tough spot for me. As one of the original USPSA guys -- I was present at the meeting when the original bylaws were drafted, then founded Front Sight, helped launch NROI, etc.-- I originally envisioned SG as being heavily USPSA oriented. Unfortunately, the organization has, at times, been difficult to deal with, and I'm not interested in stumbling over Scoutten's crews when I film. Secondly, there is ZERO viewer interest in " professional shooters," "raceguns," long, brainless run-and-gun stages, man-on-man shoot-offs and the other shibbolets of USPSA competition. I track my numbers and they are consistent.

Leaves me kinda in a dilemma...your thoughts?

Michael B
Michael Bane, Majordomo @ MichaelBane.TV

bbbean

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 133
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2011, 11:39:48 AM »
Secondly, there is ZERO viewer interest in " professional shooters," "raceguns," long, brainless run-and-gun stages, man-on-man shoot-offs and the other shibbolets of USPSA competition. I track my numbers and they are consistent.

Leaves me kinda in a dilemma...your thoughts?

Michael B


"Zero viewer interest"? Is that akin to the argument you used to hear about how no one cared about concealed carry or competitive shooting - that US gun owners were only interested in hunting and the occasional bullseye match?

I get that USPSA left you behind somewhere along the way and that you have a burr in your saddle about the top open shooters. But I think you're missing out on some great TV. I know I'd much rather watch any of the top shooters burn through an interesting stage than to see another "here's the machine that dips the frames in wondergoop for that great finish" segment. I'd also note that (as you know) there are very few "professional shooters" in USPSA. Even those who could conceivably fit that label are primarily professional instructors and small businessmen who compete to maintain their edge and their reputation, but the dollars come from teaching classes and running shops. Like the instructors you work with on your show (or you, for that matter), the top USPSA shooters are simply guys who love to shoot and put enough time and effort into it to be the best at what they do.

But it's your show, so do whatever floats your boat. 
--
Barry Bean
Fastest of the slow shooters, best of the bad shots

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10995
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1140
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2011, 11:41:26 AM »
Since I posted this the other day I have had another thought:

Short reports like Larry Potterfield's segments that would give us results of the latest major shoot or updates on the major and up and coming players.  And maybe USPSA, SASS and others would actually pay a little to have their up coming events put out there for those that might be interested.

I understand that there is not the broad base of interest, but there is a segment that follows it.  I also understand you thoughts on putting your crew next to Scoutten's.  I've touched on my feelings about them in the past and will leave it at that.
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #5 on: Today at 05:39:11 PM »

Michael Bane

  • Global Moderator
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1478
  • Host & Editor-in-chief
    • michaelBane.tv
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2011, 12:52:13 PM »
Brother Bean (Bane = McBane = Sept of Clan McBean);

It's harder to argue with Nielsen ratings than with burrs in my saddle. Numbers don't lie, and not just my own numbers. I've been privvy to others ratings info, and it confirms my own.

Last year Marshal and I tried a different tack...both of us thought that the logical "home" for the shooting sports was the Internet, so why not create a place for the sports there, then use that base to push the broadcast product.

The biggest push including putting together a "match in a box" concept for DRTV, where we would do extensive match coverage, a la ESPN Sports Center, packaged with increased print coverage via Jim Shepherd's Wires (our plan included funding and creating a new "Competition Wire" to expand coverage). The base idea was that DRTV would become the central clearing house, so to speak, for shooting sports coverage; the sanctioning bodies would chip in to help defray the cost (not humongous, but significant); we'd keep running tallies of top shooters in various sports; we'd set up an easy system for clubs to report their scores; we created an outline of how clubs could cover their own matches (especially Areas and regional-size matches) to the point of purchasing loaner video cams to send out with detailed instructions and what we would need so we could have much more video coverage; we'd develop "sports columnists" for lack of a better word, to post regularly on each of the sports, e.g. short interviews with specific athletes, sports specific new products, with the idea that columnists could also add an audio podcast on his or her sport; we would cover the most important competitions in each sport, starting with the various Nationals and, ideally, expanding to regional coverage; as we progressed, we'd add video sport-specific training from the top shooters in the sport, so we could use the site to drive increased participation. We would use DRTV's sports coverage to "drive" SG broadcast, dedicating at least 1 SG episode a season to the match DRTV had chosen, so we'd get a broadcast push for the shooting sports site. Finally, further down the line, we'd create and host a multi-discipline invitational match, which would be filmed for SG and DRTV.

Me, Marshal and Paul Erhardt from USPSA spent a lot of time bulletproofing the "match in a box." Every single point had been beta-tested in the Real World and was found to work. We lined up and made the initial overtures to potential lists of companies and organizations to provide the seed money, etc.

When we finally presented the idea, everybody — EVERY FREAKIN' BODY — hated it. I have never been so completely and so totally shot down not just by my bosses, but by the organizations, who didn't want the extra work, logistics, and certainly not a fee, by the shooters I floated the idea past, who didn't understand how such a concept would benefit them, hell, as far as I know Alf the Wonder Beagle didn't like the idea either. Obviously, we were laboring under some major misconceptions!

After the conference calls were all over, Marshal and I just took the whole proposal and threw it away.

I have routinely covered competition and will continue to do so in 2012. We will be doing a full-court-press at the MGM Ironman and a new elite military competition. In general, I have several criteria for considering a match for coverage:

1) I'd prefer exclusivity, but that's not necessarily a deal-breaker.
2) The match has to be important in the overall context of driving the shooting sports.
3) I MUST have the 100% cooperation of the Match Director and the match staff, including the range/safety officers on the line.
4) I will NOT have my crew yelled at, pushed, insulted, or the like (and yes, all of those things have happened); we are the most experienced and most professional crew in the field and we will be treated professionally or we will leave.
5) If I shoot, I pay an entry fee like anyone else; I do not accept prizes or a trip to the prize table.
6) We are unique in that we ask no money from the match organizers; we are there as journalists and we pay our own way.

As far as USPSA goes, I consider Executive Director Dave Thomas and Marketing Manager Paul Erhardt among my closest friends. We talk on a regular basis...in fact, we did a women of the shooting sports episode of SG at their request...it'll run later this season. I am always open to suggestions. But regardless of how much of an asshole it makes me, I will NOT try and ram television coverage down anyone's throat...as I have explained many times, think of me as a vampire...unless you ask me in, I'm not going to step over the threshold!

Michael B
Michael Bane, Majordomo @ MichaelBane.TV

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10995
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1140
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2011, 01:04:23 PM »
Point taken.

Now if we can just get some in the industry to understand that there are some of us that follow the sport just like some follow baseball, football, NASCAR, basketball, etc., and get them to invite you in and us through you.
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

bbbean

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 133
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2011, 06:31:26 PM »
Thanks, cuz. That explanation holds more water.

BB
--
Barry Bean
Fastest of the slow shooters, best of the bad shots

Bill Stryker

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2011, 10:32:50 AM »
When USPSA or IPSIC or whatever comes on, I switch channels.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: USPSA Coverage
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2011, 10:34:57 AM »
When USPSA or IPSIC or whatever  SPORTS comes on, I switch channels.

I'll play some of them, I have no interest in watching some one else do it.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk