My first and currently only hunting rifle is a .270 WSM. I have shot several deer with it and farthest any one of them has run is about 30 feet; most drop in place. Do I think it's necessary to have a magnum for deer hunting, no. However, the recoil from my rifle isn't that bad, and I like it. The main advantage to short magnums and similar is that you get a powerful round in a smaller lighter rifle.
I do wish I had a more common caliber, .270 or .308 etc., when ammo gets low.
I agree with the guy in the podcast in that hitting the target accurately is the most important thing.
I really don't care what folks use to hunt as long as they do it ethically and get children, wives, friends, etc. involved. My employment depends on hunting.
OK. What do y'all think about his statement on the .243? I mentioned this to some friends who are hunters and it was like they thought I had become possessed by a demonic spirit!
Their contention is the caliber is not "potent" enough to the job on whitetail deer. When I mentioned that FL deer are no bigger than large dogs, they wouldn't budge; maybe they shoot deer over in the panhandle (west Florida) where they are a little bigger.
It's should be more than enough in the South, but I personally like larger calibers. It should be a great rifle for women and children.