Let me start off by saying I love Hornady, along with most all of their products. Steve Hornady has done wonders with that company since the passing of his father Joyce. But in this case I'll take a pass. I just can't see the sense of paying the same for Berdan Primed, steel cased, non reloadable ammo, as for Boxer Primed, fully reloadable, brass cased ammunition. This stuff offers zero cost savings. In fact I can buy Mag-Tech, and bargain basement Federal for the same or less, and have reloadable brass.
Another thing about shooting steel cased .308 in a weapon like a Springfield Armory M1-A is the steel case won't obturate, (sp.), and seal off the way a brass case will, Berdan primed or otherwise. The result is a lot of blow by gas gets back into the action. This makes for getting a weapon filthy in short order. Not a good option in a semi auto centerfire. The exception is the AK-47, which was designed around corosive, steel cased ammunition.
Hornady is searching for a new market. For that I commend them. This however, isn't it. I see no advantage in regards to price or performance over what is obtained by it's use. Especially when I can purchase Mil-Surp ammo of much the same type for a fraction of the cost, and end up with much the same thing. Bill T.