CR, my brother, normally I agree with you on whatever you post. Here, however, we have to diverge. FA ain't right for a bunch of reasons.
1. Gold standard - no, it did not work for 180 years. True, it worked well for a while, but the price has been manipulated for more than a century, most notably with the formation of the Federal Reserve (which in fact is neither) and especially when FDR made ownership illegal, confiscated it at something like $20+ an ounce, and when he had collected most of it, thereupon announced its value was now magically raised to $36 an ounce - creating a huge windfall for the gummint - where the price lay for decades. regardless of world demand. Complete manipulation.
2. Gold standard redux - From what I have read and heard, the amount of gold we would need to actually base the US dollar on gold has never been mined in the history of this world. Therefore, the dollar would have to be seriously revalued - which needs to be done anyhow - and that alone would cause major economic upheavals. And this will never happen, as it would mean the dollar would have to be revalued to the "good", whereas world powers and big shots are actively trying to destroy the dollar.
3. Withdrawing troops - maybe. However, the G2 (intelligence) we get by being involved abroad helps keep us safe here. It was a massive intelligence failure due - in part - to the klintoon administration's refusal to let various gummint agencies share data and follow up jointly on leads, architected by our likely next head of the FBI, Jamie Gorelick, that created a huge gap in our intelligence gathering and processing, and thereby leading to 9/11. In this day and age, isolationism will get you dead.
4. Isolationism - in this, I may have to agree with FQ (feh, yuck, ptooey - oh, right, broken clock syndrome, that works) in that Paul is blinded by a "perfect" adherence to Ayn Rand's Objectivity and has forgotten 2 points:
- politics is the art of the possible; and
- war is politics by other means (TY von Clausewitz)