The Rural Council And Exectuive Order 13575,...Oh You Missed It Too?

[twyacht]

Gee,....it's also part of the United Nations Plan For Sustainable Development....I'm sure that's a good thing,...

Missed it on just about every news channel out there, including Fox,.....Hmmmmm...

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-the-new-white-house-rural-council-uns-agenda-21/

Does The New ‘White House Rural Council’ = UN’s Agenda 21?

    Posted on June 21, 2011 at 2:34pm by Mike Opelka

On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order, and almost nobody noticed.

(For the record, Obama is on par to match President Bush’s 291 orders executed during his two terms in office. The National Archives defines an Executive Order this way; Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government.)

President Obama’s E.O. 13575 is designed to begin taking control over almost all aspects of the lives of 16% of the American people. Why didn’t we notice it?  Weinergate.  In the middle of the Anthony Weiner scandal, as the press and most of the American people were distracted, President Obama created something called “The White House Rural Council” (WHRC).

Section One of 13575 states the following:

    Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.

Warning bells should have been sounding all across rural America when the phrase “sustainable rural communities” came up. As we know from researching the UN plan for Sustainable Development known as Agenda 21, these are code words for the true fundamental transformation America.

****

Oh wait,....it gets better..

The United Nations has pushed their sustainable development program for almost twenty years. The UN’s “social justice” blueprint called Agenda 21 requires governments to control almost all aspects of an individual’s life, but has recently met with substantial resistance in America. Since The Blaze covered this topic and the story appeared on Glenn Beck’s Fox TV program, we have been inundated with reports from around the country about efforts to remove ICLEI and Agenda 21 from local governments.

It appears that not a single department in the federal government was excluded from the new White House Rural Council, and the wild card option in number 25 gives the president and the agriculture secretary the option to designate anyone to serve on this powerful council.

***(list at link)**** Why would Homeland Security and the SecDef be involved in RURAL DEVELOPMENT???

The third sentence also makes it quite clear that the government intends to take greater control over “food, fiber, and energy.”

The last sentence in Section 1 further clarifies the intent of the order by tying together “access to the capital necessary for economic growth, health care and education.”

****We are so getting played like pawns in a chess game*****

Thinking of Alfred E. Newman again

[crusader rabbit]

It hurts me to say this, but we are so screwed...

...Unless we manage a concerted effort to get this band of socialists and Marxists to vacate the premises.

[tombogan03884]

The f*cking sheep deserve it.
If they actually were MEN, with real balls they would have started hanging these azzholes 30 years ago.
But as long as they have their beer, their recliners, and their TV you can do pretty much anything you want to them.

[Herknav]

If they actually were MEN, with real balls they would have started hanging these azzholes 30 years ago.

30?  Hell, I'd start with Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and LBJ.

[tombogan03884]

30?  Hell, I'd start with Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and LBJ.

Apparently we need to have a bloody purge of Government about every 100 years to keep the b*stards honest.

[Sponsor]

[twyacht]

Here's where it can effect gun owners.

http://thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/06/brad-kozak/while-we-were-sleeping-obama-86th-executive-order/#more-51919

My first question is, since the government seems to be doing such a bang-up job with the work they’ve already got on their plate, why are they expanding the role of government, and why do it now? (The last part’s easy – they did it now, because nobody’s looking.) Some of the buzzwords that should be jumping out at you are safeguard our natural resources and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.

But that’s just the start. Essentially, what this order does is to establish a council that will oversee how the Feds interact with “rural America.” In this case “interact” means “regulate, control, and generally mess with.”

Let’s look at how this new council might affect the rights of gun owners.

For the sake of this argument, lets say that the council is filled with those who have no love for guns, and are generally anti-gun. (Look at the list of who’s on there. Oh, no! Too late.) So they start passing regulations that significantly curtail the use of firearms on public lands. Like things such as the California ban on lead ammunition in the name of “saving the endangered falcons and condors?” How’d you like that to go nationwide? Or how about an ordinance that carries some serious penalties for leaving spent brass out in the great outdoors? Noise pollution? Oh, yeah – they could easily add regulations that would prohibit loud noises that might endanger the fragile ecosystem. (Never mind that it hasn’t hurt anything for hundreds of years.)

I know some of this sounds ridiculous. And it is. Right up until the time that it becomes the law. Then it’s a tragedy. Now you might think that this is just a bunch of paranoid ramblings, or suspicions of things that will never come to pass. You might also argue that this is all too random to be anything like an organized effort to put a Progressive agenda in place. Whoops. Wrong again. Ever hear of the United Nations “Agenda 21″ initiative?

Executive Orders (no matter who issues them) are dangerous things. They are dangerous because they allow the Federal Government to have enormous powers over things that Congress never legislated and We the People never intended. And remember, the most dangerous thing to our freedom isn’t a member of the Taliban. It’s a nameless government bureaucrat, who holds the power to screw with your life, with absolute impunity.

More at link.

[Badgersmilk]

Apparently we need to have a bloody purge of Government about every 100 years to keep the b*stards honest.

   You put the words "honest" and "Government" in the same sentence!     SILLY!   

[tombogan03884]

    You put the words "honest" and "Government" in the same sentence!     SILLY!   

Not if the purge is bloody enough.