Tom, if you can prove that you went to a less than lethal option before using deadly force it will look a lot better for you in court.
Horse crap. I have serious heart problems simply pissing me off can induce a fatal heart attack which has , in the past, been ruled as murder.
Any physical attack has the potential to be fatal and therefore justifies a lethal force response.
If you are not physically threatened then YOU are the one in the wrong for escalating the situation by resorting to any physical response, including flashing a light in the other persons eyes.
To look at it another way , this is cross posted from the "Less lethal" thread :
The person who replies to physical danger with POTENTIALLY, (no magic bullets) lethal force, in other words a gun, is aiming to end the threat as rapidly as possible.
The person who resorts to "less than Lethal means" simply seeks to inflicted extended pain and suffering on an individual as punishment for making poor life choices. It indicates a very disturbed and poorly adjusted personality.
Pepper spray ? You want to employ "chemical weaponry ?
Isn't that why they hung Saddam ?
Reply