killing puppies

[GASPASSERDELUXE]

It all ends with puppy-killing SWAT teams

As you may have noticed,Penn Jillette has an opinion piece on CNN that talks about why he is a libertarian. It’s all over my Facebook feed,so it’s resonating with peopleUncle pointed out that Jillette used the phrase “government is force”,which is a rare thing to see in an MSM piece.

Here is the what he said:

    There is great joy in helping people,but no joy in doing it at gunpoint.
    People try to argue that government isn’t really force. You believe that? Try not paying your taxes…. When they come to get you for not paying your taxes,try not going to court. Guns will be drawn. Government is force —literally,not figuratively.

I would like politicians and bureaucrats to acknowledge this:Every law,rule,and regulation made by the government ends in puppy killing SWAT Teams. Every dime that is spent in our name was taken at gunpoint.

I want them to understand that every action they take has this statement as a footnote:“This is important enough that my grandmother should be killed if she does not abide.”

The rhetoric might be a little over the top,but that doesn’t mean it’s not true. Take the story of Rawesome Foods,who were raided twice in one year by full-ninja swat teams for such horrible crimes as “improper egg temperatures.” I mean really what could possibly justify that?

It seems ridiculous that this could happen,right? Well,all it takes is one word:No.
As an example,I’ll use my city’s recent doubling of property taxes to fund such necessities as computerized timing mechanisms for public baseball fields. Here is how it goes:

    Government:We need to double your taxes so that umpires don’t forget to turn off the ballfield lights after games are over.

    Citizen:No.

    Government:Um….but we need it.

    Citizen:No.

    Government:Well,it doesn’t matter what you think. You have to pay it anyway.

    Citizen:No.

    Government:[Later] I see you didn’t pay the new tax rate. Here’s your updated bill with penalties and interest.

    Citizen:No.

    Government:Okay,fine. See you in court!

    Citizen:No.

    Government:What? BUT YOU HAVE TO GO!

    Citizen:No.

    Government:Fine. We waved a magic wand and took ownership of your house. You have to get out.

    Citizen:No.

    Government:[Press Release] SWAT was deployed today and killed a barricaded suspect. Multiple attempts to negotiate were rejected,so SWAT had to move in. The suspect resisted arrest and was shot 37 times. We waited a couple of hours and then found out he was dead.

 Pick any issue,and that’t how this will end. From speeding tickets to multiple murder,the only way to ensure a civilized society is with brutality. If a violation doesn’t end that way,then what’s the point? I mean,if I can just say no until you go away,then why have the rule in the first place?
August 17th,2011 | Category:OFFICER SAFETY!
1 comment to It all ends with puppy-killing SWAT teams

    *
      SayUncle »A reminder

[tombogan03884]

Mao said "all political power comes from the barrel of a gun"
This is the basic reasoning behind my opinion that some find offensive, that a large number of people in govt. media, and academia need to be taken out and shot.
Note that I am not saying, as I was misquoted, that they need to be assassinated.
Assassination is an individual act that would not achieve the desired effect .
Execution after a "drumhead" trial is an action of the masses that would let the remainder know that they are in their position only because we their employers allow them to remain there.

[fightingquaker13]

Uh Tom, might want to read upon the 1A. You want to shoot politicians who wield the power of the sword, well the OP applies. But to murder people like you who choose to spout off an opinion others find offensive? That's grounds for war and I don't care what side they are on. Left, right or other. If you attack people for their opinions, you attack me. And with my new Bond, you won't see me coming.
FQ13

[Pathfinder]

Mao said "all political power comes from the barrel of a gun"
This is the basic reasoning behind my opinion that some find offensive, that a large number of people in govt. media, and academia need to be taken out and shot.
Note that I am not saying, as I was misquoted, that they need to be assassinated.
Assassination is an individual act that would not achieve the desired effect .
Execution after a "drumhead" trial is an action of the masses that would let the remainder know that they are in their position only because we their employers allow them to remain there.

Actually, that's why I like the quaint Roman custom of simply designating them an "Enemy of the People" and letting the populace do their thing.

That, or the Mussolini solution.

 

[fightingquaker13]

Actually, that's why I like the quaint Roman custom of simply designating them an "Enemy of the People" and letting the populace do their thing.

That, or the Mussolini solution.

 

How about the American solution of respecting freedom of speech?
FQ13

[Sponsor]

[JC5123]

How about the American solution of respecting freedom of speech?
FQ13

What is that? Get the media and academia to demonize anyone who opposes you?

[Pathfinder]

How about the American solution of respecting freedom of speech?
FQ13

I was referring to the wankers in .gov who willing and knowingly violate (act, not speech) their oath and the Constitution of the US to line their pockets with others' cash or power.

Figures you'd get that wrong. 

[fightingquaker13]

What is that? Get the media and academia to demonize anyone who opposes you?

Umm....I was thinking more along the lines of letting people say what they want to and not getting violent if you don't like it. Maybe just trying that whacky thing called arguing back or changing the channel. Y'all really need to take a step back and listen to yourselves, because one American to another you are getting a little scary right now.
FQ13 who likes being able to say unpopular stuff without the threat of violence.

[JC5123]

Umm....I was thinking more along the lines of letting people say what they want to and not getting violent if you don't like it. Maybe just trying that whacky thing called arguing back or changing the channel. Y'all really need to take a step back and listen to yourselves, because one American to another you are getting a little scary right now.
FQ13 who likes being able to say unpopular ignorant liberal talking points without the threat of violence.

No one here has ever threatened you. Only set you straight. 

Besides, I think that the fear of a good old fashioned a$$ beating would make some of these idiots think twice BEFORE they open their ignorant pie holes!

[fightingquaker13]

No one here has ever threatened you. Only set you straight. 

Besides, I think that the fear of a good old fashioned a$$ beating would make some of these idiots think twice BEFORE they open their ignorant pie holes!

Or at least boost ammo sales, CCW permits and NRA memeberships, so its a win win.
FQ13