« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: HARD TO KILL  (Read 2331 times)

GASPASSERDELUXE

  • Guest
HARD TO KILL
« on: September 21, 2011, 06:51:53 PM »
http://concealedcarryholsters.org/wp-content/files/FBI-Analysis-on-PA-Police-Shootout.pdf

An autopsy with photos and narative of a gun fight and the poor performance of .40 cal and .223 rds.
Logged

Ichiban

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1847
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2011, 07:34:38 PM »
Weird. 
- The .40S&W Gold Dots only penetrated 1"?  There's something fishy there.  A .22 would do better.
- 107 rounds expended and 17 hits?  That's about par.
- "Shot placement is everything in a gunfight and always the key to stopping a threat effectively."  DUH!
Logged

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2011, 08:12:13 PM »
Distance of roughly 20 feet? Penetration 1"? I'll bet Speer has something to say about that....Something seems left out.

However, the human body is hard to kill without a cranial/cervical/spinal impact.  Deers/hogs can run a good way on adrenalin even after a pulmonary/cardiac cavity shot.

Many a convict is proud of his bullet wound scars in prison. After looking at the pics, it seems this was one of those types.

- 107 rounds expended and 17 hits?  That's about par.

 ::)

I don't intend to shoot and kill anyone, I intend to stop a lethal threat if needs be,....if the BG dies, than so be it, and no great loss to society.

(paraphrased Jeff Cooperism)....

Logged
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

Ichiban

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1847
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2011, 08:39:21 PM »
Quote from: twyacht on September 21, 2011, 08:12:13 PM
Distance of roughly 20 feet? Penetration 1"? I'll bet Speer has something to say about that....Something seems left out.

I wonder if it was department provided and they had gotten a tainted batch of ammo.  At any rate, that just aint normal.
Logged

mkm

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2011, 08:56:34 PM »
I'm confused. 

That's a pretty bad presentation, and the information is kind of circular. It really doesn't provide a good enough explanation of what happened or a decent conclusion.  First, they say the .40 failed and the .223 saved the day.  Second, they say both were insufficient?  Third, they say the .40 couldn't have fully expanded like it did with only 1" of penetration and that it didn't fail.  The .40 was "FBI approved" and the .223 was not, hmmm.

The hit counts don't seem to add up either (still a lot less hits, especially to critical areas, than shots).  Whatever happened, shot placement should have been better.
Logged

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #5 on: Today at 05:43:32 PM »
Logged

Pecos Bill

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2011, 09:22:59 PM »
If this is actually official, I think it reflects the ineptitude of government reporting by reflecting opposing conclusions about a bad incident. I won't begin to have the courage to draw my own conclusions though I have questions about where the 40 S&W stuff was before it hit the trashy. Somewhere in that mess of language there was mention of hitting the wind shield.

Pecos
Logged
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." - Mark Twain

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11269
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1560
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2011, 10:24:39 PM »
I like his tattoos. "live by the gun, die by the gun" and "whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger".  :)
Logged
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2011, 11:34:02 PM »
Quote from: jumbofrank on September 21, 2011, 10:24:39 PM
I like his tattoos. "live by the gun, die by the gun" and "whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger".  :)


So does this mean I should stick to steroids since the gunshot therapy didn't work so good ?
Logged

oldkat69

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 164
  • Fides sed veritas
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: HARD TO KILL
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2011, 07:10:06 AM »
 ???  Is this why my "club" is a .45 double stack 1911?

By the way I hear Para is making them again.
Kimbers are awesome! I wonder why the quit making them?
Logged
I used to be open minded but my brain kept falling out.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk