Author Topic: National Reciprocity?  (Read 20795 times)

JLawson

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #60 on: November 16, 2011, 11:55:36 PM »
Fox/AP is reporting the vote as 272 to 154.  It would take two-thirds of those voting to override Obama's veto.  If everyone who voted the first time also showed up for the override vote, it would take about 284 votes to override the veto.  Do you think they could muster the 12 votes?  The Senate has no parallel bill.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/16/house-to-vote-on-concealed-firearm-permit-bill/?test=latestnews


TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10220
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #61 on: November 17, 2011, 01:37:43 AM »
Thats assuming it makes it back thru unchanged...  I wouldn't count on that.


Even if this does pass, I have little doubt that several AGs will be filing law suits to stop it.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #62 on: November 17, 2011, 06:53:31 AM »
Thats assuming it makes it back thru unchanged...  I wouldn't count on that.


Even if this does pass, I have little doubt that several AGs will be filing law suits to stop it.

That is probably true...

But I wonder how strong their case would be when they have not objected to Driver's License reciprocity?

More folks are killed with automobiles each year than guns and automobiles are used in the commission of crimes probably more then firearms and automobiles are owned by more folks then own guns....

And even if they do win, it seems that may lead to a case mandating legal open carry for all non-residents who can carry legally in their home state....which isn't an unwelcome eventuality.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10220
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #63 on: November 17, 2011, 01:20:57 PM »
That is probably true...

But I wonder how strong their case would be when they have not objected to Driver's License reciprocity?

More folks are killed with automobiles each year than guns and automobiles are used in the commission of crimes probably more then firearms and automobiles are owned by more folks then own guns....

And even if they do win, it seems that may lead to a case mandating legal open carry for all non-residents who can carry legally in their home state....which isn't an unwelcome eventuality.




there are 2 outcomes I can forsee, 1 the law is thrown out or is watered down to the point where it does nothing.

2 they creat national standards. 

remember if you lose you DL in one state, you can't just move ti a duffrent state and get another.  you can with a ccw.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #64 on: November 17, 2011, 01:26:00 PM »
I agree with TAB here. I'm good in something like 37 states with my Fl. permit. I expect that number to go up. I get that I'll never carry in Hi. or NJ., but I can live with that. I think the states are doing a pretty good job of negotiating this sort of thing on their own. I don't trust the feds here.
FQ13

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #65 on: Today at 03:36:53 AM »

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #65 on: November 17, 2011, 01:35:13 PM »
TAB has a vested interest in seeing this fail.

If it passes and everyone can carry everywhere, he will have to stop calling Uncle Ted scum because he got sworn in as a deputy sheriff and could carry everywhere when other could not......

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10996
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1148
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #66 on: November 17, 2011, 02:04:47 PM »
I'm still campaigning for my proposal:  We have the Second Amendment, and that is good nationwide!  If I break a law that negates my constitutionally protected rights it will be noted on my driver's license or state identification just like a drunk driving incident would be.  I want to purchase a gun, they call in my id number and if I'm legal I take the gun, if I am carrying they call in my id number and if I'm legal I walk.

Simple Huh?  And as I have said before, this is far more restriction than the courts will allow for voting.
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

jaybet

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3773
  • NRA Life Member, DRTV Ranger, Guitar Player
    • Bluebone- Burnin' and Smokin'
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #67 on: November 17, 2011, 02:09:27 PM »
I'm still campaigning for my proposal:  We have the Second Amendment, and that is good nationwide!  If I break a law that negates my constitutionally protected rights it will be noted on my driver's license or state identification just like a drunk driving incident would be.  I want to purchase a gun, they call in my id number and if I'm legal I take the gun, if I am carrying they call in my id number and if I'm legal I walk.

Simple Huh?  And as I have said before, this is far more restriction than the courts will allow for voting.
I like it. National reciprocity as it is working it's way through Congress could screw me good. As a NJ resident, would that mean I COULD NOT carry in any state since I can't get CCW in my home state?
I got the blues as my companion.

www.bluebone.net

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10220
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #68 on: November 17, 2011, 02:19:43 PM »
TAB has a vested interest in seeing this fail.

If it passes and everyone can carry everywhere, he will have to stop calling Uncle Ted scum because he got sworn in as a deputy sheriff and could carry everywhere when other could not......




you forget, I have my ccw. 
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: National Reciprocity?
« Reply #69 on: November 17, 2011, 02:31:28 PM »

you forget, I have my ccw. 

But you can't carry everywhere like that scum can.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk