I know it may not apply to George since he votes for a guy who couldn't get nominated in 6 tries, but some of are smart enough to only make a mistake once and then learn from it.
So not only are you slow figuring it out for yourself, your to dumb to understand when some one explains their own experience to you.
Is that the best you really can come up with? You can't even admit you really don't have a voice here since you are guilty of the same "sin".
And here's the best part, Tom. I really don't have a problem with your vote for Perot. I voted for 41 and I couldn't understand why people were "throwing away their votes" or "voting for Clinton by voting for Perot". Then I grew up, read some books, talked to some people who knew what the phuck they were talking about, thought about what I read and paid attention to what was going on around me. Then I realized that as cantankerous as he was/is he was right about alot of things, specifically NAFTA.
This shouldn't be hard for anyone, especially you, to understand. My beef here is your constant condemnation of me and anyone who would dare to vote for the one who they think is the BEST choice to lead our country. And you have done the same damn thing in the past.
And you really don't think Romney is the best choice for this country either. Do I need to pull all of your quotes where you have called him a "lying POS" or something similar?
So as long as you are going to play the game of a vote candidate x is a vote for candidate y, then I'm going to hang you with your own rope. It's that simple...