I'm asking as a 2A, NRA Life Member, (lapsed) GOA member, Concealed Carry, et al advocate/practitioner, member of forums like this one, and in that respect, at least, not unlike you all here..
Why not Perry?..
The guy goes to the range to unwind and just as his hobby. He CCs everywhere he goes, because that's what he does, not because he's an elected, public figure.. Of the field, I don't think anybody comes close to his record on 2A issues. He doesn't lead with rhetoric. He leads with actions, both legislative and personal.
On this issue, Santorum isn't bad, but not as good as Perry, I don't think, because he doesn't carry as a rule that I know of.
RP? Who knows...
Huntsman says what he says but I don't see a guy who isn't going to compromise on liberty "for the sake of the greater/common good".
Gingrich talks a good game but he's not the guy who I can trust that 4 or 8 years after he takes office that I know that my liberty will be as intact/expanded as it was on Jan 20 2013.
Romney has a bad record on 2A. $100 per firearm, annualy in Mass, or you're a criminal who will go to jail/lose said firearms..
On the economic issues of the day, Perry is as good or better than any of the rest of them. TARP would never have happened under Perry. Trillion a pop Debt increases would never happen under Perry. Not even Gingrich can make me believe that he would never do that..
Paul, if he actually wanted the job, would let it explode and pretend that the carnage that followed didn't exist, from what I hear. Everything I hear him say kinda sounds like he'd pull the pin and walk away without evacuating the building. I've never heard him say anything about an orderly step back to whatever Ammendment he wants to strip it down to..
Without going on at length on the other stuff though, why not Perry, as gun guys, one and all..
Poorly worded and limited, but that's my question..