I agree that Glocks have a pretty good safety system.
And, for sure, a Glock laying flat on a table and undisturbed has as much chance of discharging as any revolver or hammer fired semi in the same circumstances.....virtually zero, if not zero. Cooking off the rounds with microwaves would count as being disturbed.
But, as safe as that would be, if my daughter stood on her tiptoes and looked over the edge of the table into the barrel of that gun, even if it was well out of her reach, I'd be strongly uncomfortable with that situation.
I think that is what AE is getting at.
But the chances are so close to zero as not to matter.
The DEA had what was called the Frisbee Test, where a cocked Glock (I don't think it was loaded, but they may have done that in a safe environment) was tossed like a frisbee into a wall or to the floor to see if there were any failures. (15 foot toss with 4 foot drop)
The Glock did fail. The slide was jarred from the frame but the striker remained cocked, or half-cocked to be more precise. The result of the test was modifications to the partial frame rails embedded in the Glock frame, making the bigger and stronger (took two tries at it but any Gen 1 Glocks can be upgraded for free), but nothing was needed as far as the striker, it was solid.
If the Glock can repeatedly withstand that kind of impact and abuse, I can't imagine any type of normal disturbance causing a spontaneous discharge.