Author Topic: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics  (Read 7700 times)

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
A 2400gr bullet, this SSK Ind. .950 Caliber rifle,....well,....at $40 per bullet.... :-\ It only takes one to stop a locomotive....

Propelled by 240 grains of powder, the JDJ is comparable to a World War I-era tank round or a 20mm cannon in terms of kinetic energy, one of these rounds would easily pass through several human targets– even if each were equipped with full body armor.

Weight: 50lbs. 25,000lbs energy....

Uber "big" gun porn.... :o




Of course there is video!!!!



*****

I have no words....
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6748
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 474
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2012, 05:30:56 PM »
I'm liken that rest!

Magoo541

  • Bryan Munson
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2012, 12:01:27 PM »
Makes me want to build a 25mm with a  BIG muzzle brake on it.  If only I knew a machinist that could do it?  Oh wait that would be me  ;D

Dreams like that are what keep me sane with 3 teenage girls in the house...
He who dares wins.  SAS

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2012, 12:35:24 PM »
Aren't there NFA limits on muzzle diameter for "rifles" ?
Mauler may be the one to answer this.

GASPASSERDELUXE

  • Guest
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2012, 12:47:20 PM »
It would have to be registered as a destructive device.

Sponsor

  • Guest

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6748
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 474
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2012, 02:32:31 PM »
Aren't Destructive Device Licenses very expensive?

GASPASSERDELUXE

  • Guest
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2012, 02:37:47 PM »
If you can afford $40 a piece just for the bullets I don't think that would be much of a problem.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6748
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 474
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2012, 02:50:46 PM »
If you can afford $40 a piece just for the bullets I don't think that would be much of a problem.

I not seeing why they're so expensive? If you had access to a small CNC bench chucker lathe, you could turn them up and part them off out of 1" brass bar stock. You wouldn't even need software, you could finger dink it in manually.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2012, 06:03:05 PM »
You have to make the cases as well.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Because Somebody Had To Make One Bigger...The .950 JDJ Video & Pics
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2012, 01:08:37 PM »
Aren't there NFA limits on muzzle diameter for "rifles" ?
Mauler may be the one to answer this.

I PMed Mauler, since that is what he does. Below is his reply.

"Yes.  Anything over .50 Caliber (or specifically .510 which is the .50 BMG) is considered a Destructive Device and therefore subject to the NFA of 1934.  Of course, there are exceptions made for "sporting purposes" which is why we have the .577 Tyrannosaur, the .600 Nitro Express, the .700 Nitro Express and so on.  If you are going to build your own at home I believe you would need to either apply for a sporting purpose exception or register it as a Destructive Device."

This isn't meant as legal advice "Legal advice".

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk