new executive order

[Tyler Durden]

just click and read the link:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness

[rojawe]

Just add that to the NDAA and the HB 347 that can have you arrested for Picketing Political figures and the march to a dictator goes on. How many have called their Senators and Representatives to voice their opinion on these items. Keyboard gorillas doesn't cut it you have to call and email

[Hazcat]

Not really new.

As it turns out, Obama’s executive order is nearly identical to EO 12919, issued by President Clinton on June 7, 1994, which itself was an amendment to EO 10789, issued in 1958 by President Eisenhower, and which in fact, was later amended by EO 13286, issued in 2003 by George W. Bush.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/executive-order-panic-martial-law-in-america/

[Tyler Durden]

Haz, you're harshing my mellow.   

come on, now, I am trying to paint Obama as some power grabbing stomp on our rights dictator.

you're letting facts get in the way.

I guess I will go wipe the egg off my face now.

[alfsauve]

Don't go feeling that bad Tyler.   I posted this in another thread.

First, I don't remember anyone being thrilled with the previous EOs, either.

There are subtle changes that give rise to suspicion, such as conferring authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security to determine periods of national defense emergency.

The timing of this with the political conventions coming up.

Even the "expert" quoted by WND has his doubts, just no hard evidence.

And anytime someone says,  "Morrissey concludes, “but this is really nothing to worry about at all.” it's a sure sign you should worry.

[Sponsor]

[Hazcat]

Haz, you're harshing my mellow.   

come on, now, I am trying to paint Obama as some power grabbing stomp on our rights dictator.

you're letting facts get in the way.

I guess I will go wipe the egg off my face now.

Sorry, TD!  My bad!