Poll

Should Women Be Allowed To Be Deployed Into Combat?

Yes
No
Not Sure

Author Topic: Women In Combat Poll Question  (Read 13047 times)

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Women In Combat Poll Question
« Reply #40 on: May 03, 2012, 10:09:36 AM »
The last 3 posters are all basing their opinions on current social and cultural conduct.
As the circumstances of "women in combat" change so will the cultural and societal reactions to them.
You are confusing cultural prejudices with immutable facts of life.
Look at the difference in reaction to the Presidential campaigns of Shirley Chisholm and BO.
40 years ago a black President was unthinkable, now it is a reality.

Also, KSail is out of his freaking mind.
Look at the sh!t hemorrhage the media had over one US soldier allegedly going on a killing spree in Afghanistan.
What would be the result of a battalion of armed women with PMS ?

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Women In Combat Poll Question
« Reply #41 on: May 03, 2012, 12:19:14 PM »
This reminds me of the whole Jessica Lynch ordeal. That story was plastered everywhere for weeks. Would it have been if she were a he?

I don't think we can blame male/female solider interactions for the media running with this story.....the Pentagon or other top brass didn't mind encouraging the coverage.

I do believe that the rescue mission would have been mounted just as willingly had it been a male soldier.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Women In Combat Poll Question
« Reply #42 on: May 03, 2012, 12:23:54 PM »
The last 3 posters are all basing their opinions on current social and cultural conduct.
As the circumstances of "women in combat" change so will the cultural and societal reactions to them.
You are confusing cultural prejudices with immutable facts of life.
Look at the difference in reaction to the Presidential campaigns of Shirley Chisholm and BO.
40 years ago a black President was unthinkable, now it is a reality.

Also, KSail is out of his freaking mind.
Look at the sh!t hemorrhage the media had over one US soldier allegedly going on a killing spree in Afghanistan.
What would be the result of a battalion of armed women with PMS ?

Tom, I was basing my my observations on current trends....but stated I believe those current social and cultural mores will change as qualified women assume combat roles.

   
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 478
Re: Women In Combat Poll Question
« Reply #43 on: May 03, 2012, 12:50:03 PM »
I do believe that the rescue mission would have been mounted just as willingly had it been a male soldier.

I believe so as well. But the media hyped it because of her being.....well her. It's like the whole Trayvon Martin mess. If it were the other way around it would have been a 30 second filler story at 11:27 PM. Now it's prime fodder for months.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Women In Combat Poll Question
« Reply #44 on: May 03, 2012, 12:55:59 PM »
This reminds me of the whole Jessica Lynch ordeal. That story was plastered everywhere for weeks. Would it have been if she were a he?

That's exactly why women should be considered combatants.
She was in a "noncombatant" (maint IIRC ) unit and was completely unprepared for the situation she wound up in.
In modern warfare there are NO non combat units in a war zone.
If women are going to serve in the military at all it is nothing short of murder to leave them thinking they won't be shot at.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Women In Combat Poll Question
« Reply #45 on: Today at 05:39:42 AM »

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk