The part you don't seem to get is that Romney, since he is not a card carrying communist who associates with self confessed , and convicted bomb planting terrorists, could sacrifice sheep and virgin's and still be a much better choice than BO.
As for my reaction to your posts, why should I be respectful toward comments that show you haven't studied the subject when I have ?
There may be no such thing as a dumb question, but ignorant / uninformed statements don't deserve respect.
Two points..
1. I don't know if you got the information but (if he gets the nomination in Tampa) I'll vote for Romney for this reason..
It's not that Romney is "that good", because he's not.. It's that Obama is "THAT BAD".
It goes against everything in me, and should he win, I'll fight to replace him in
2016, unless he shows me that he has changed his mind about his policy views on the 2A and others as well, of
his past.
2. My instinct is to remind you and all of us that worse than a "Know It All" is one who is immodest, but the two character flaws are rarely found separately. I've seen no evidence of an exception to that rule here..
But since most people already know that, I probably wouldn't bother pointing that out.. It wouldn't change anything in those so afflicted..
I post things like this here for the sake of discussion, so that I can learn from
civil discussion . If you see the topic as beneath your superior understanding of all things, I suggest that you don't participate in the otherwise civil discussion, thus not soiling your superiority by association with unworthiness to such as yourself..
While I wouldn't expect such as yourself to give consideration to a suggestion from someone as lowly and simple as myself, this is my simple, modest suggestion..