So, explain your justification for us destroy the property of residents of a country where our armed forces are stationed when that property proposes no immediate threat to our troops or out country?
Well, to begin on a very minor point, CID is working full time prosecuting drug crime in the ranks, the drugs being produced and sold locally. I only mention that in direct answer to your question, because of a conversation with a CID SSGT back from Afghanistan over Christmas 2010, and an episode from several years ago now where two idiots got killed at a local bazaar trying to find a buzz.. Idiots..
The larger point is that it creates cash money.. hard currency for the savages to fund operations to confront soldiers there and civilians here. Purchase of opiates on the streets here, (and around the world) destroys lives, here, turns the streets, here, into war zones, here, and runs counter to every effort the country (gov't) has made to stop the domestic destruction caused by it's presence, here..
I'm not worried so much about an Afghan dirt/poppy farmer exacting his revenge for taking his cash crop.. They are starving over there.. If you can't grow anything else in sh** soil, you can grow potatoes and/or peanuts..
If their activities over there weren't hurting us, here, I'd go along with your point. That isn't the case, though.. It hurts us, twice, HARD..
If we weren't occupying the place, I'd say that invading Afghanistan to destroy the poppy fields might be a bit of a stretch. We're already there. It's not much of an effort.. Before you offer the example of paraquat, I'm not suggesting to poison the product.. I want the fields unable to sustain plant life of any kind.. No, we're not going to convince them to plant a different crop, anymore than we're going to convince Peru or Bolivia to stop growing coca plants. (Coca
leaves, btw, are good for what ails you.. I think they ought to be legal to buy at the pharmacy or grocery store,
to be used in that form, only.. I'm familiar.. It doesn't hurt you.. But I digress..)
The stuff creates a real, major problem, for us, here.. We can curtail the effects of the problem here, with very little effort, there, while we're there..
What do we lose here by taking anti drug policy to it's logical conclusion there in this circumstance? Are we afraid we're gonna piss em off or something?.. We're not cultivating the place for Disney to Exxon. You can't go surfing there.. Islam can't use it as a stick to beat us over the head with since it's against their "faith" to partake..
Who loses, that we want to see win?
I'm sorry if "lame" is a word that offends, but it's as accurate as any.. Show me an excuse for not dealing with it that isn't lame.. I'm not seeing it.. And I'm not trying to be confrontational with you.. I'm just stating my case..