http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=21306.msg267333#msg267333Jumbo, I posted on this subject in the Downrange #295 thread .
This isn't Clinton's 1994 .
The Gun grabbers have the media so they hear their own message .
But that's ALL they have.
In 94, I was the only person I knew who owned or had owned an AK, every one I knew who owned an SKS had bought it from me when I needed money, I'd bet there were not 25 civilian AR's in the State of NH, and every other state was similar.
Today there are many more people who own, or have owned an AK or AR than there are who haven't .
If that were not the case then they would not be setting sales records every month.
I say let the gun rights fanatics do the negotiating now since the grabbers don't have anything to work with.
Here's what I'm thinking, If we are turning the focus away from guns and onto crazy people we can't touch NICS, (for now) but we start rolling back specific provisions of GCA 68 and NFA, for example, we will let them continue to register machine guns, but silencers are off the list, they are hearing protection and should not be regulated any more than condoms, it's a health issue, and it protects the hearing of children engaged in healthy sports with their families.
requiring guns to be shipped to an ffl was justified under the "commerce clause", but any one who has actually read that clause knows they don't have a leg to stand on, so we hold that hostage "You import the historic relics (M 1's ) from South Korea or we will get the FFL requirement overturned .
It's time to turn the tables, we have reached a tipping point as the VPC recently said but it's not the one they think, we can go for all the marbles that matter now by agreeing to leave them a few face savers that don't really matter.
For now.