Solus,
Your theory of take a small victory, shut up, attack, shut up, attack, ... is exactly what the other activist groups say we are doing wrong. The successful groups have attacked, attacked hard, and even today with all a group like abortion rights they do not back off.
Have you ever tried to purchase a suppressor? That process is what take a little and shut up has gotten us. Today the whole class three mess is so deeply entrenched in the government and the minds of the sheeple who do not even understand it that we will have a tough fight resisting its expansion, much less its repeal.
I never said shut up...I said DON'T shut up
I think many more people will accept armed security guards in the schools...Military or police officers... than arming teachers..the way it should be done.
As soon as that is in place, the logistics problems will present themselves and rather than take away that protection, other options will be considered. Parents are looking to volunteer for school security. That will keep guns in the schools, but still out of the classrooms...which will be more attractive to some ...and a pretty workable solution.
From there, arming teachers as the 'last line of defense' will be easier.
Are you going to tell me it will be as easy to convince folks to arm every teacher who wants to carry than it will to convince them that we need armed guards in the schools?
And about the sales. I said it could be to collections. We don't know. You made the statement it was proof we had more support. Show me that proof. Show me the number of first time buyers in the sales.
And then show me that most of those first time buyers agree teachers should be armed.
And if anything, this buying indicates the belief that restrictions will increase...or why the buying frenzy?
If we have such sure support, why not require gun safety and marksmanship training be made available for all the students as part of the package? I, for one, think that would be the ideal approach.