I stopped getting paid to be in harms way in the early 90's. Not looking for cheap junk, not looking for gold lined.
This is a good point. I think many invest in these high end scopes for no other reason than to mimic what, "the soldiers carry". While there is nothing wrong with that, it does involve paying a lot for something you really don't need. Take an ACOG for example. Many will tell you a Trijicon is the only way to go, and most everything else is junk. Same with Aimpoint for red dots, and U.S. Optics and Nightforce for tactical scopes. How many civilians put their equipment through the same rigors the military does in Iraq, Afghanistan, or most anywhere else? Almost none. While it's certainly nice to have the strongest and the best, most are paying a real premium for something they'll never require.
Most of these are simply not necessary for 99.9% of most shooters. The only civilian exception I would make is for die hard competitors who want to leave absolutely nothing to chance. Even then, they could easily get away with spending a lot less. Now if you're someone who can lay down 2 1/2K for a scope like it's nothing, then fine. But few shooters fall into that category. With today's economy, when you take into account the rising price of guns and ammo, that money could go a lot further buying things that will keep you going to the range to shoot. Instead of sitting home admiring a rig that you have minimum ammo for.