I have a Hillary theory

[jaybet]

I've got a theory about Hillary Clinton. I started thinking about it when one of my dull-witted acquaintances posted a thing on Facebook about her being the next president.

This is based totally on my observations and warped thought patterns- no evidence, no facts.

I think after Benghazi Hillary had a complete mental breakdown. She didn't testify, then had the "accident" and was out for a month or two. Then her testimony was brief, then she resigned, and she has completely dropped off the face of the earth. I think it's being completely buried and squashed, but I think she went off the deep end.

Grounds for disqualification as a presidential candidate.

Just throwing it out there.

[Timothy]

She's not qualified because she's a Democrat but yours works too!  What experience does she have that qualifies her to be anything more than a housewife anyway?  The State Department?  The Senate?

Please..she's a completely made gal for all the wrong reasons!  She slept with a president....based on that criteria Monika Lewinsky's just as qualified...

[fightingquaker13]

I'd rather have Monica than Hillary (in every sense of the word) as at least she's honest. Hillary is too old and too damaged to be POTUS. However, by pretending like she's running she can suck the wind and money out of the Dem field and play king maker.

[lhprop1]

I'd rather have Monica than Hillary (in every sense of the word)

Either way, you're following Bill. 

[crusader rabbit]

I think your theory may have some merit, Jay. It accounts for all the missing pieces, and the timeline certainly fits. 

I suspect knowing that your ineptitude was a direct and causative factor in the death of four good Americans might tend to throw anyone into a bit of a tailspin. 

Her entire history is one of potential evil--think back on the Whitewater scandal and Vincent Foster. 

It isn't a great stretch to think that all this, triggered by Benghazi,  descended in a sudden crescendo of guilt that caused her to become non compos mentis for at least awhile. 

And, she has had a large number of other stressors in her life, specifically, her demonstrated inability to keep her husband from sampling every inkwell he manages to come across (and the play on words is intentional).

Finally, attempting to justify the liberal playbook requires a disassociation from reality.  Maintaining that duplicitous mindset has to be stressful.

You may be onto something, here Jay.

Crusader Rabbit

[Sponsor]

[Solus]

I agree with the assessment of Hillary.

It is a major psychological shock when you are forced to realize that your ideology has no basis in reality.

Also, it is not Hillary I am concerned will become the first woman president, but Michelle. 

[tombogan03884]

Hillary was a has been long before Benghazi .
She started campaigning while Bill was still Pres .
For the entire time Bush was in office Hillary and Company were touting her as the second coming .
And then she got blown out of the water by some half term Senate hack no one ever heard of .
She may run again, but she will not get Party support , she's a loser and the Dems don't give losers a 2nd chance.

[Magoo541]

Either way, you're following Bill. 

EWWW!!!!

Need to find some EYE BLEACH! 

Come 'on man!

 

[fightingquaker13]

Hillary was a has been long before Benghazi .
She started campaigning while Bill was still Pres .
For the entire time Bush was in office Hillary and Company were touting her as the second coming .
And then she got blown out of the water by some half term Senate hack no one ever heard of .
She may run again, but she will not get Party support , she's a loser and the Dems don't give losers a 2nd chance.

Yep. In this they're smarter than the GOP. AKA the "It's his turn" party. They seem to think rewarding retreads with the nomination as payment for loyalty is a good idea. Let's see...Dole, McCain and Romney. How's that working out? Reagan was the only modern example where this worked.
 The Dems are a more Darwinian bunch. You get one chance to run and then see ya. And its working for them. Hillary had her shot, but the stars aligned against her (plus her campaign sucked). We'll see someone new in 2016. Everyone is tired of the Clintons.

[tombogan03884]

Yep. In this they're smarter than the GOP. AKA the "It's his turn" party. They seem to think rewarding retreads with the nomination as payment for loyalty is a good idea.  Let's see...Dole, McCain and Romney. How's that working out?Reagan was the only modern example where this worked.
 The Dems are a more Darwinian bunch. You get one chance to run and then see ya. And its working for them. Hillary had her shot, but the stars aligned against her (plus her campaign sucked). We'll see someone new in 2016. Everyone is tired of the Clintons.

Our History Professor again gets it wrong .
He forgot "Tricky Dick" Nixon, who may have got caught in Watergate but was a hell of a lot better President than any one, except Reagan, who has come since then.