You didn't learn a damned thing from the recent Va election did you ?
The DEMS spent over $1MILLION backing a GOOD 3rd party candidate.
He didn't have a hope in hell of winning but he got enough votes from idiots to cost the Republican a 3% victory. instead he lost by 1% and Va residents are now going to get "Detroited" all because of pig headed people who just don't get it..
Tom, you sound satisfied with the performance of most Republican politicians....either that or you like the performance of a few well enough to buy the whole package.
I and others just are not that pleased with them. While I think they are better than Democrats, it is only because they move in the same path as the Democrats...they just go a bit slower to get there...but get there they will.
Voting for the Democrats or their near twins, the Republicans, will make sure nothing changes. Keep doing the same thing and you can only expect the same results.
If everyone fed up with the Democrats and the Republicans would vote for the strongest 3rd party candidate there would be a chance for different results. Maybe not in the first election cycle, but it would grow. And in the meanwhile, both Republicans and Democrats would rewrite their song and dance to include a few verses and steps from that 3rd party.
Sure, past performance indicates that all the promises will be false from both the Republicans and Democrats, but it might just stick long enough to influence a few issues while the spot light is on them.
Maybe it would be possible to "convert" a party, say the Republicans, to the new 3rd party, but it seems unlikely after watching how the party establishment fights the Tea Party element.
Honestly, I don't expect this to happen. It seems just as improbable to get voters to alter bad patterns as it is to get politicians to do so.
This leads me back to your "Hemp Solution" which seems more and more likely to be how things will need to go. The only feasible, but unlikely, alternative is for a 3rd party to make progress.