Author Topic: Gun Owners got letters  (Read 5892 times)

ratcatcher55

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Gun Owners got letters
« on: August 21, 2008, 12:16:27 PM »
Sorry but this seems pretty poor work for an LEO agency.  I'm sure they are desperate to clear this up but I have to say I would not have come in myself.
 

 
 


By MANNY GAMALLO World Staff Writer
8/20/2008
Last Modified: 8/20/2008  2:20 AM


OSBI agents went to gun dealers and pawnshops to create a list of .40-caliber Glock owners.


WELEETKA — Authorities working to narrow their leads in the June 8 shooting deaths of two girls used old-fashioned legwork to come up with a list of area gun owners with .40-caliber pistols, one of two weapons used in the slayings.

Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation agents knew the caliber of the guns used in the killings, so they merely checked with area gun dealers and pawnshops to determine who had bought or recently pawned .40-caliber Glocks.

"It's a typical procedure of any investigation" involving a gun, according to Jessica Brown, spokeswoman for the OSBI.

That time-consuming procedure yielded the OSBI the names of more than 60 owners of .40-caliber guns in the Weleetka area.

Consequently, the OSBI sent letters to all those gun owners, asking them to voluntarily submit their weapons for test firings over the weekend at the Okfuskee County Courthouse at Okemah.

About 40 of those gun owners showed up on Saturday and Sunday, and their weapons were fired once or twice and then returned to them.

The fired bullets and shell casings, meanwhile, were sent to a crime lab for analysis to determine if any of them match those used in the slayings of Skyla Jade Whitaker, 11, and Taylor Paschal-Placker, 13.

Brown said about five of the gun owners no longer owned the weapons, but they provided the names of the new owners.

The other 15 or so gun owners who did not show up will be checked by the OSBI to see why they didn't volunteer for the test firings.

"They can have any number of reasons" for not volunteering, Brown said. "They could be against it, they could be anti-government, or they eventually may want to help."

Because the test firing of the weapons is voluntary, Brown said there isn't any constitutional violations involved.

"It's a process of elimination," she said, noting that the tested weapons may have been loaned out by the owners or someone else may have had access to the guns.

On Monday, when the OSBI announced that it had test-fired weapons, it stated in its press release that it had sent letters to the "registered gun owners."

That prompted concern Tuesday among many in the public, who noted that Oklahoma does not have a gun-registry law nor a central database of gun owners.

Tom Harris, an agent with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in Tulsa, confirmed that.

According to Harris, most states, including Oklahoma, and the federal government do not have lists of registered gun owners.

He said the only way to get a listing of gun owners is by canvassing gun dealers or pawnshops individually to find out who bought weapons — as the OSBI did.

Harris said gun dealers — "federal firearms licensees" — have to fill out ATF form 4473 whenever a weapon is purchased. The form lists the buyer, the address and other pertinent information.

They also have to contact the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to determine whether the prospective buyer can legally purchase a weapon.

Harris said the 4473 forms stay with the gun dealers and are not submitted to any government agency. They are, however, available to law enforcement.

If a gun dealer goes out of business, the 4473 forms are stored in an ATF warehouse, he said.

Although the OSBI made public that a .40-caliber weapon was used in the slayings, it is not identifying the caliber of the other gun used.

Brown would not say whether voluntary test firings would be held for the other weapon.

Authorities believe the killers are from the Weleetka area, given the remote location of the girls' slayings.

They said the killers had to be familiar with the area — N. 3890 Road (County Line Road) north of Coleman Road, about four miles northeast of Weleetka.

Skyla was visiting Taylor at her home when they decided to go for a walk that Sunday afternoon.

They walked north from Taylor's home along County Line Road to the Bad Creek bridge, a half-mile away.

Investigators said the two had made it to the bridge and were returning to Taylor's home when they were gunned down.

Their bodies were found in a shallow roadside ditch, less than 1,000 feet from the Placker home. They were found about 30 minutes after they had left for the walk.

Autopsy reports on the girls showed they had been shot a total of 13 times.

Skyla, the youngest, was shot eight times, and she suffered the most .40-caliber bullet wounds.

Authorities noted that each of the girls was shot with two weapons.

The medical examiner recovered spent bullets from their bodies and described them as small- and medium-sized.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





unique

  • Guest
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2008, 04:21:31 PM »
I know there's going to be some who disagree, and I understand that what the police did was a long shot, but as far as I'm concerned, I'd be first in line to have them test fire my gun if it in any way possible helped catch the sick SOB that did that.
I know it's probably some government plot to steal our guns, but I don't care, somethings are worth the risk.

tumblebug

  • Guest
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2008, 04:36:15 PM »
 +10

ratcatcher55

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2008, 05:03:36 PM »
I know there's going to be some who disagree, and I understand that what the police did was a long shot, but as far as I'm concerned, I'd be first in line to have them test fire my gun if it in any way possible helped catch the sick SOB that did that.
I know it's probably some government plot to steal our guns, but I don't care, somethings are worth the risk.

That's my problem with it. If you don't come in your a suspect/ potential suspect. What are you going to do if they don't?
Pull their CCW? What if they don't have one? Tap their phones?

In a hit & run you may ask people with the same type car where they were on the day of the crime IF you have a reason to think they were in the area. You don't tell everybody with a Toyota to them to bring the vehicle to the station so you can collect evidence from it.  Then go get warrents for those that don't?

I do agree with you Unique, catch and juice the folks that kill ed the girls.



unique

  • Guest
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2008, 07:28:30 PM »
According to the article, there were 60 owners of .40 cal guns in the area, and yes, they were all going to be check out, that's what I would do if I were a cop.  But that takes a lot of time, so why not help?  You're going to get checked out anyway.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #5 on: Today at 12:43:11 AM »

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2008, 08:46:53 PM »
Slippery slope of "Big Brother" and doing the right thing.  In  Wash DC, they will invite you down to the station, register your firearm and "fire" it, almost like giving your fingerprints for committing no crime, "just to have on file" type thing.

I just have a reluctance to willingly furnish private property and aspects of my private life to any gov't.

If I get pulled over 2 weeks later for a burned out taillight, will there be an asterisk next to my name as a "gun owner".

I'm all against getting the bastard that did this, but it could set a precedent for other gun crimes I didn't commit.

If I buy a .357 at a gun show, and that night someone is assaulted and shot with a .357 across town, should I be sent a letter to come down and "furnish" a fired round?

I'm sorry, it seems dangerous.
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11203
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1532
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2008, 01:35:58 AM »
I'm assuming you're all familiar with Nazi Germany, and hopefully with the movie Red Dawn. Registration eventually leads to confiscation.
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6447
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2008, 06:02:18 AM »
I'm assuming you're all familiar with Nazi Germany, and hopefully with the movie Red Dawn. Registration eventually leads to confiscation.

And "official" knowledge of your firearm is the first step toward registration, if not actual registration itself.
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

ratcatcher55

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2008, 08:11:12 AM »
"there were 60 owners of .40 cal guns in the area, and yes, they were all going to be check out"

No there were 60 folks who had purchased or transfered .40 caliber guns that they had records for.
Anyone who moved into the area who already had the firearm would not be in the records.

Anyone who had a gun illegally would not be in the records.

By the way Mrs Ratcatcher 55 said she would take my gun down for testing if I didn't.  So much for my position.

Ocin

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 210
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Owners got letters
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2008, 08:35:51 AM »
Slippery slope of "Big Brother" and doing the right thing.  In  Wash DC, they will invite you down to the station, register your firearm and "fire" it, almost like giving your fingerprints for committing no crime, "just to have on file" type thing.

I just have a reluctance to willingly furnish private property and aspects of my private life to any gov't.

If I get pulled over 2 weeks later for a burned out taillight, will there be an asterisk next to my name as a "gun owner".

I'm all against getting the bastard that did this, but it could set a precedent for other gun crimes I didn't commit.

If I buy a .357 at a gun show, and that night someone is assaulted and shot with a .357 across town, should I be sent a letter to come down and "furnish" a fired round?

I'm sorry, it seems dangerous.


I would have to agree with twyacht. Here in Holland the police have started with taking DNA samples from large groups of men in a larger area where there has been a serious sex offense (usually with the victim being murdered during or after the incident) to "support and further" their investigation. As of yet, neither of such DNA collecting actions have ever shown positive any result what so ever, other then providing the authorities with a DNA sample of an innocent man,  to be used for, yeah, well, for what? Future cases? A database? Previous cases?

Nobody really knows how the authorities handle such "evidence", how it is stored, where, why and who controls it.

Now they start talking about making such large random tests a standard procedure and trust me, soon anyone who won't participate is a suspect.

Ocin.
Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.
Gandhi, An Autobiography, p. 446 (Beacon Press paperback edition)

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk