Thank you Superheat, its always nice to have someone jump in with both feet and stand up for their personal opinion on a firearm to be discussed and debated on IMHO the best forum to do so.
That being said, the Michael Bane reference to a slighted 1911 preference shows your lack of awareness to the diversity of this forum. Respectfully, MB has previously posted on a number of caliber platforms that are suitable for the application of the owner, and an endorsement of many other than the 1911.
After all its the owner that buys (with hard earned money), the caliber and pistol that suits them best.
I own a Kel-Tec P3AT in .380 to a S&W .460 XVR. with many in between. All suit the application they are designed for. Concealed carry, target, comp, etc,....
Again, Glocks have a no holds barred rep for simplicity, form and reliability. The 1911 has been around much longer, with torture tests that have been tried and tried again before Glocks were even on a design table.
Yes, certain brands dropped the ball. Just like other name brand manufacturers who did as well.
Glocks had "blow ups" previously posted on this forum at length, don't get too caught up in the hype..
Thanks again for your input, don't bash a platform that "SET" the status quo that others follow to this day.