Author Topic: New ATF ruling effect reloading?  (Read 3300 times)

Jim Kennedy-ar154me

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
  • NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1672
New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« on: August 30, 2016, 12:26:39 PM »
I believe this will make reloading a bit more expensive. Looks
like they are reclassifing smokeless power and "hign explosive" if I read this correctly.
http://www.ammoland.com/2016/08/atf-reclassifies-wetted-nitrocellulose-as-explosive-materials-under-federal-laws/#ixzz4IpB2SZ1F
The time for action is upon us and the enemy is at our gates. Let us not allow them one more inch of advancement but instead throw them through the gates of Hell.

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7225
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 833
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2016, 04:44:53 PM »
Well this sure great on top of everything else going to heck.

https://www.atf.gov/file/106536/download

On the surface it doesn't look like a big deal but it may affect the guys who manufacture powder and that is a big deal.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11269
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1560
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2016, 08:00:50 PM »
Don't high explosives blow up even when they aren't in a confined space?
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2016, 06:03:46 AM »
This shit is nt law.
It is policyIf you tolerate it you deserve it.

nosimij

  • Active Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 81
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2016, 11:44:03 AM »
The intent is to bump the HAZ material fee to the point where it is not cost effective to reload so everyone gets rid if their equipment and then they can take steps to more make ammunition harder to get.  Another of the thousand cuts.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 05:42:38 AM »

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2016, 08:22:18 PM »
Understand this goes all the way down to day to day LEO and concealed carry.

Fire code as well as state DOT codes come into play.  You, or your local LEOs can't just store ammo anymore in any old plain building.  Now both storage and transportation must meet much more highly restrictive levels.   Think of LEOs who are carrying spare "EXPLOSIVE" ammo in the trunk of their car.  Heck what's the regs on carrying "EXPLOSIVES" by anybody in public places?

Of course, state and local governments could exempt LEOs from compliance of such. 

I can see it though, somebody who was shot in the commission of a crime, will sue the LEOs for using excessive force.  Explosives.
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

jaybet

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3773
  • NRA Life Member, DRTV Ranger, Guitar Player
    • Bluebone- Burnin' and Smokin'
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2016, 09:02:59 AM »
Didn't read the whole thing but it looks like they're already backing off on this...at least for now.
I got the blues as my companion.

www.bluebone.net

ellis4538

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3455
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2016, 04:50:48 PM »
The way I understand it this applies to wet nitrocellulose or whatever it is and the way it is handled.  Doesn't seem to be all that bad and shouldn't influence prices at all.

FWIW


Richard

PS:  I don't have a link but I read it on FB so you know it's true!  LOL
Used to be "The only thing to FEAR was FEAR ITSELF", nowadays "The only thing to FEAR is GETTING CAUGHT!"

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7225
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 833
Re: New ATF ruling effect reloading?
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2016, 08:02:34 PM »
I think it will make it harder for gun powder manufacturers to acquire...raising the cost.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk