Trump Insulting Women ... Again

[billt]

I'm just going to add, Bill Clinton had Monica under the desk doing unspeakable things and he got reelected.

That happened in Clintons second term. He did not get reelected. But he did get impeached.

[Rastus]

I'm going to pull the lawyer/manager thing on you Bill.    OK, should have said it differently.

He wasn't indicted but he was doing it when he was reelected. 

And women still love the standby for the Lolita Express to this day...amazing. 

From the commie news network:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/resources/lewinsky/timeline/index.html

[Steve Cover]

Mr. C, by now you know that it's from over a decade ago (depending on the new sources you access).  I'm not saying locker talk is OK...but it does happen when the girls aren't around. 

I'm just going to add, Bill Clinton had Monica under the desk doing unspeakable things and he got reelected.  So...what's the big deal here?  Action speaks louder than words....or does it for the dems

That was the point.
Except that the lame stream media protects the dems.

Steve

[tombogan03884]

Oh heaven forbid, Trump said mean things.
He never had to give DNA  evidence in a sex assault case.

[Solus]

You know I've always said the prime function of the POTUS was to bolster the self image of girls and women who have low self esteem. 

The importance of protecting national secret information, protecting the lives of Americans abroad, protecting our national borders and up holding the constitution pale in comparison to not offending women and girls.

Locker room talk may not meet someone's standards of behavior, but it has nothing to do with the ability to perform duties and responsibilities of the POTUS well.

[Sponsor]

[Rastus]

You know I've always said the prime function of the POTUS was to bolster the self image of girls and women who have low self esteem. 

The importance of protecting national secret information, protecting the lives of Americans abroad, protecting our national borders and up holding the constitution pale in comparison to not offending women and girls.

Locker room talk may not meet someone's standards of behavior, but it has nothing to do with the ability to perform duties and responsibilities of the POTUS well.

Are you saying women should not vote because they vote their self-emotions?   

[tombogan03884]

No, you're saying that.
But I'm not disagreeing.  LOL

[billt]

Are you saying women should not vote because they vote their self-emotions?

If he isn't, I am. When women were given the right to vote in 1920, there were many Senators and Congressmen who argued strongly against it. They gave many reasons why. Emotional instability being one of them. Here we are, almost 100 years later, and everything they argued that would happen, has happened.

Hillary lost the debate last night because she acted like a woman. She couldn't help herself because her emotions took over. Trump rattled the hell out of her all night, while remaining confident and composed. She couldn't keep her emotions in check long enough to articulate a decent comeback. Just a bunch of regurgitated drivel. Unlike Trump who produced the comeback of the campaign.... Hillary, (in a moment of emotional weakness): "It's a good thing you're not in charge of this nations laws!"....... Trump: "Because you'd be in jail."

 If her and that ass wipe Raddatz had it their way, the entire debate would have been spent discussing how Trump mentioned he liked to play grab ass 11 years ago. The only thing that surprised me, was after the debate, their handlers were able to get both of those squawking chickens back into their cages.

[Solus]

Are you saying women should not vote because they vote their self-emotions?   

Not what I was getting at, though I have a woman friend who says women should never have been given the vote because of that.  I've never felt not allowing anything is a valid answer.

I was getting at the Clinton Ad showing girls looking in mirrors and feeling bad about their appearance.  The solution to that is not prohibiting discouraging talk, but teaching folks to evaluate themselves by what is important to them, even if only to them.

Let me add that "not allowing anything" is broader than I intended.  The Constitution, Bill of Rights and other documents define what is "allowed" or not.
 

[Rastus]

<snip>
Let me add that "not allowing anything" is broader than I intended.  The Constitution, Bill of Rights and other documents define what is "allowed" or not.
 

Yeah, yeah...I know what you meant.   But I had more fun.....

That doesn't mean that the 19th Amendment should not be repealed.  Just so we can get back to our roots..as it were.