Author Topic: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations  (Read 8306 times)

PegLeg45

  • NRA Life, SAF, Constitutionalist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13268
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1382
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2017, 11:07:29 AM »
I read several articles saying this is killing the silencer industry. Sales are plummeting to the point many silencer companies are laying off people. The reason is many people who want them are waiting for this to pass so they won't have to eat the $200.00 tax to buy one. Many also believe they will drop in price, because the only thing holding the price up is because it's a NFA item.

Regardless if it's true or not, people are holding off on buying these things. In a way I can't blame them. In a lot of locations the paperwork for these things takes forever to clear. So a lot of people figure they have to wait anyway, so why not hold off until they can simply walk in and buy one without having their names and address on file with the ATF? And end up $200.00 richer too boot.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/02/foghorn/layoffs-reported-silencerco-citing-lagging-sales-due-hearing-protection-act/

http://modernrifleman.net/2017/02/02/mass-layoffs-at-silencerco/

http://www.recoilweb.com/whats-quieting-the-silencer-industry-126010.html


Such is the danger of serving a niche market.
In a way, the company leaders did it to themselves, and I hate that folks are losing jobs because of it.

Suppressors are cost prohibitive in nature because of both the $200 tax and the actual cost of the can. I mean let's be realistic, by the time you pay the tax and then buy the can, you'll end up with (in many instances of the average Joe) a device that cost more than the rifle or pistol it's going on. I just built a $450 AR pistol and I'm not going to spend $400 to $800 (depending on brand + the stamp) for a can for the thing.

And let's also be honest about the cost..... they could sell them cheaper and sell more volume, but they have viewed it from the point that if someone can afford the stamp, then they can pay up for the can.

I have a friend who filed his own paperwork and got his stamp and then built his own suppressor for less than $50 and engraved the number on the parts. And for $250, his works as good as another friend's expensive store-bought unit.

So, I'm one of the guys who decided to wait until after the election (a gamble) to see what would happen.
Best case scenario for me is a deregulation of suppressors and I'll buy or build one (neighbor has a machine shop (  ;D  ). Worst case, the bill don't pass, then I'll file the paperwork and get the stamp and build one anyway (yes, this was always an option before now, but I haven't been as interested in a can as I am now since using a couple on other people's guns at the range).
"I expect perdition, I always have. I keep this building at my back, and several guns handy, in case perdition arrives in a form that's susceptible to bullets. I expect it will come in the disease form, though. I'm susceptible to diseases, and you can't shoot a damned disease." ~ Judge Roy Bean, Streets of Laredo

For the Patriots of this country, the Constitution is second only to the Bible for most. For those who love this country, but do not share my personal beliefs, it is their Bible. To them nothing comes before the Constitution of these United States of America. For this we are all labeled potential terrorists. ~ Dean Garrison

"When it comes to the enemy, just because they ain't pullin' a trigger, doesn't mean they ain't totin' ammo for those that are."~PegLeg

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2017, 11:32:56 AM »
....And let's also be honest about the cost..... they could sell them cheaper and sell more volume, but they have viewed it from the point that if someone can afford the stamp, then they can pay up for the can.

I have a friend who filed his own paperwork and got his stamp and then built his own suppressor for less than $50 and engraved the number on the parts. And for $250, his works as good as another friend's expensive store-bought unit.

I couldn't agree more Peg. These things have been a rip off for years. There is nothing to them to justify the ridiculous price they charge for them. They're a glorified muffler, nothing more. Most of these things can be produced for the cost of one progressive stamping die. For what they're charging, they can pay off the die in the first 100 units they sell. The material cost, (even if they use Titanium), isn't that much based on weight. For Stainless Steel it's even cheaper. And as you mentioned, there is no way these things are worth as much, or more than the gun they're going to be screwed on to. You watch how cheap they get when this law passes.

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10220
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2017, 02:42:01 PM »
any decent machinist can build a can.  the thing is they are expensive because of limited supply.   if any one could make them, the price would cut in half.  simply do too the fact that small shops have to spend big bucks on machines that don't run enough to be practical.   a small job shop could make them very quick and cheap.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2017, 06:00:31 AM »
Some one was selling a fitting that screwed onto a threaded barrel and was threaded for an oil filter..
 The onlything that really needs any thought or research is baffle placement for best performance.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2017, 06:25:57 AM »
Some one was selling a fitting that screwed onto a threaded barrel and was threaded for an oil filter..
 The onlything that really needs any thought or research is baffle placement for best performance.

The only problem is the iron sights are completely useless.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t_pcWPdSDs

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:14:23 AM »

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2017, 06:53:01 AM »
Same is true wit most cans unless you get raised sights.

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11269
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1560
Re: Senior ATF official proposes loosening gun regulations
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2017, 02:48:31 PM »
If you use a fuel filter instead of an oil filter the sights don't have to be raised as high to see over it. http://www.2acheck.com/wix-fuel-filter-suppressor-wix-fuel-filter-solvent-trap/
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk