9th circuit backs right to carry firearms in public

[Solus]

This is not Fake News..as much as it sounds like it.....

Liberal 9th circuit backs right to carry firearms in public, in latest pro-2nd Amendment ruling

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/24/liberal-9th-circuit-backs-right-to-carry-firearms-in-public-in-latest-pro-2nd-amendment-ruling.html

[MikeBjerum]

Not what you would expect from that District, but will take it.  Sad that we need to fight and fight for such a clearly worded item in our constitution.

[Jim Kennedy-ar154me]

Seems the "Shall not be infringed" is not plain enough for these idiots. But I know I am preaching to the choir. They started the infringement in 1934 as far as I am concerned.

[TAB]

They also kept the tro  on the new .ca law that made it illegal to own 10+ round mags... 

[alfsauve]

But can a Californian own a plastic straw in the confines of their own house?

[Sponsor]

[jaybet]

But can a Californian own a plastic straw in the confines of their own house?

As long as there's only a hole in one end, and it's not bendy.

[PegLeg45]

But can a Californian own a plastic straw in the confines of their own house?

Probably depends on whether it can be permanently attached to the cup or not and if it will require a "straw button" similar to a bullet button on an AR.



Give it time, since they are now weapons of assault in the UK it's just a matter of time before Kali moves in that direction.

A BOY of 13 was charged with assault after he allegedly used a straw to fire a french fry at a woman in McDonald’s.
-The teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons, allegedly used the straw to launch the chip at the woman’s head at a McDonald’s restaurant in the Broadway shopping centre in Hammersmith, west London. This then sparked a bust up between three of his friends and four young women which spilled outside.
The child was prosecuted after it hit the other customer’s face.

https://metro.co.uk/2018/07/23/boy-13-charged-assault-firing-mcdonalds-chip-straw-hitting-woman-7747164/?ito=cbshare

[billt]

Trump is on a mission to replace overly liberal Federal judges. That have been making irrational decisions, and who have been trying to push liberal views from the bench. I can't help but wonder if this decision was a result of their fear of his actions.

Trump does what he say's. And he is not afraid of any political repercussions from the liberal media. Trump is famous for a, "tow the line or you're out", attitude. Judges have cushy jobs, and they don't want to lose them. Regardless of their political viewpoint.

[Rastus]

Bill I think you are right.  When it comes right down to it they do not want to lose their gravy train.

[TAB]

They also know that the sc is going too swing right, getting overturned looks really bad and opens you up too have your other rulings challenged.