Author Topic: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022  (Read 3187 times)

MAUSERMAN

  • Murder yoga specialist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1114
  • guns and girls rock
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2020, 02:15:36 AM »
Got my 226 back finally. I took to the range at lunch, and she ran perfectly for once. This is was I expected from sig. Its a shame that it took 3 trips to sig to get it running right. Time will tell. I?ll put at least 1000 rounds threw it before I can trust it.
Judokas 🥋make the world tremble IPPON

Rastus

  • Oust the execs at the NRA ! Join and vote to overthrow Today!
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5499
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 30
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2020, 02:35:34 AM »
It's good to hear they keep working on it.  Even after two previous trips...that's pretty good.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

MAUSERMAN

  • Murder yoga specialist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1114
  • guns and girls rock
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2020, 01:26:54 PM »
I really hope third time is the charm. Sig has made me rethink ever purchasing another one of their firearms. I?ve had 2 of 3 sig firearms fail me
Judokas 🥋make the world tremble IPPON

TAB

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9174
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 18
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2020, 08:02:29 PM »
Its not what a company does right that defines  them, its what they do when they  may a mistake.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

MAUSERMAN

  • Murder yoga specialist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1114
  • guns and girls rock
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2020, 10:59:53 PM »
They?ve rectified their mistake, but why would a company?s flagship pistol leave the factory with suck poor QC? It?s like the 320 and 365. What the deal? My Sig556 I call the 50/50 rifle. It either works or not at all. Sent it 3 times as well and it still doesn?t work.
Judokas 🥋make the world tremble IPPON

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #15 on: Today at 10:38:16 PM »

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8660
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 39
Re: Such a shame Sig 226 vs 2022
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2020, 08:00:48 AM »
Its not what a company does right that defines  them, its what they do when they  may a mistake.

Exactly!
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk