Author Topic: "One in a million shot"  (Read 658 times)

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10919
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1031
"One in a million shot"
« on: July 20, 2024, 04:17:18 PM »
"Sources report"

The Secret Service "sources" have told media that the shot their sniper took on Crooks was a "one in a million shot."

The visible target was the scope, part of one eye, and the forehead. I took out my tape measure, and the cap I had on my head.  I come up with 7"-7.5" wide and 7.5"-8-5" tall. Let's just call it a 6"x7" target from 150 yards.

A trained and practiced sniper, with high quality rifle and optics, at less than 200 yards, and they are sensationalizing this as "a one in a million shot."

Any varmint or prairie dog hunters lurking on here?
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7064
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 726
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2024, 08:18:09 PM »
"Sources report..." yeah, just like they said that they had given the campaign all the security they requested and lied.  They are only trying to deflect blame since we all know that it is not a tough shot with the proper tool.  Dan Bongino has been the best source of information on this subject since he was a Secret Service agent guarding presidents and because he still has contacts in the SS.  If you believe Dan Bongino, and I do, then you know the administration is lying.   

According to Dan, there were only several (four? but no more than that, excluding the two SS sniper teams and the two counter guys dressed in black) true Secret Service agents guarding President Trump.  The rest came from other Homeland Security agencies.  I refer you to the video when Trump got into the SUV and where DEI (Diversity Equity Inclusion) Barbie and her girlfriends showed total ineptitude.  They were upset you say?  So what...well as shucks...that's OK they need to feel good about themselves.  Clearly there was insufficient team training and a great appearance of personal ineptitude as well.

To me it appears quite clear that this is overtly an administrative assassination attempt...basis of which would be knowingly restricting the protection to allow for a "monster" to be "chummed" up and have opportunity for access.  Before anyone takes up for the rulers please realize at the end of 2019 the Secret Service had over 7,600 employees.  Yeah I know, not all agents, but don't you think could have spared 1/2 dozen more out of those thousands and thousands of employees?  Insufficient coverage based upon denials of field agent requests outlining insufficient resources sure sounds like an administrative assassination to me.  The Democrats continuous crazed and ongoing hate filled rhetoric with the intent to divide us chummed up a monster, no doubt.  I love it when the dems talk about the Republicans being dangerous citing J6 when the dems allowed Antifa, et. al., to run amuck and burn down federal buildings and they deprive citizens of Constitutional rights to a speedy trial, presumption of innocence, etc. 

Dan Bongino show here:  https://rumble.com/c/Bongino
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6441
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2024, 02:38:07 PM »
There was ONE report I saw that indicated that many of the "suits" were not SS agents but in fact DHS "investigators" acting under SS directors. Can't find corroboration, but that might explain the fat DEI staff that couldn't find their holster, and the open mike on the platform after they dog-piled DJT when one agent asked "what do we do now?" - twice!
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7064
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 726
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2024, 08:29:13 AM »
It should, without investigation, be evident to all that the Secret Service was lying.  About a lot of things.

With this administration is anyone surprised?  It's a predictable pattern we see day in and day out.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7480
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 549
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2024, 10:15:27 AM »
It should, without investigation, be evident to all that the Secret Service was lying.  About a lot of things.

With this administration is anyone surprised?  It's a predictable pattern we see day in and day out.

We’re suppose to trust the bureaucrats  and politician, they know what’s best for us and have our best interest at heart.  Shame on you for having the audacity  to doubt their veracity or even imply that they might possibly be mendacious.


Remember: Democratic Party is the party of slavery, KKK, segregation and Jim Crow laws. 
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #5 on: Today at 06:04:43 PM »

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7064
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 726
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2024, 10:50:02 AM »
Dang, that's a new word for me...."mendacious".  I like it.  I'm going to use that.  Really, I had never heard that word before.  No doubt wordsmithing like that comes from having a higher education! 

With only a redneck education I'm guess I am stuck with calling them lying ba$tards. 

And what you say about the dimocrats that cannot be true.  Look at the Little Rock 9 in 1957...Arkansas Governor Faubas was a Republican and Eisenhower who actually desegregated the Central High School was a Democrat, right?  Oh wait....am I wrong?

Eisenhower was a Republican and Arkansas Governor Faubas was a dimocrat...errr, ugghhh, but that doesn't mean that the dimocrat party was actually rascist......   :o

And I really do like "mendacious" expanding my vocabulary.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7480
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 549
Re: "One in a million shot"
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2024, 11:22:41 AM »
Quote
Dang, that's a new word for me...."mendacious".  I like it.  I'm going to use that.  Really, I had never heard that word before.  No doubt wordsmithing like that comes from having a higher education!

Actually I learned if from Tennessee Williams.  Well not from him directly, but from his play, Cat On a Hot Tin Roof.  To be more specific, from Burl Ives's character, Big Daddy in the movie.

I've learned a lot not from reading the articles or studying the text books, but from plays, novels, films and ads.  Yes ads. 
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk