Author Topic: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE  (Read 586 times)

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10167
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 97
Re: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2025, 07:33:16 AM »
The thing about rugers is you throw away everything but the serialized part.

I would take a sw model 41 all day long.   My colt woodsman out shoots me despite being 70+ years old.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7501
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 555
Re: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2025, 08:23:51 AM »
Woodsman are no longer made, but with 690,000 made I’m sure there are plenty available on the used market.  The 41?  At $1,500 sure it’s good but stack that up against the custom models, some a few hundred less I’m not thinking it’s a good ROI.  Then consider using it for Steel, not Bullseye, the Ruger makes so much more sense.

Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10790
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1409
Re: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2025, 04:48:51 AM »
From what I've read about them, the S&W 41 was good for what it was made for, but expensive.

My dad had a Colt Woodman that flew out of his home-made shoulder holster when he was running through the woods and was lost forever. :( He got a Ruger Mk II Target Model which I have now. It had a MK II mag and a MK I mag that I've since replaced. The weight of 6 7/8" tapered barrel and 5 1/2" bull barrel are exactly the same. But the 22/45 Zytel grip frame is lighter than the steel MK II, so my 5 1/2" gun is lighter than my 6 7/8".
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7077
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 740
Re: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2025, 07:18:09 PM »
Well when I ride into Tulsa tomorrow I may just have to swing by a gun store or two and pick up various models. 
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10790
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1409
Re: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2025, 03:14:18 AM »
If I was going to buy another .22 pistol right now I'd get a Mark IV 22/45 Tactical with a threaded barrel, either a 4.4" barrel or a Silencer Shop exclusive 3" barrel. I don't have anything suppressed and either of those would be a great first suppressor host IMO. I'd probably get the 4.4" with sights on it, then decide what kind of red dot and light to mount. Something small and lightweight for both.

I was so used to steel frame pistols like my Colt Gov't Model, that my 22/45 felt top-heavy at first. It didn't take long to get used to it, and it should feel good to anyone who shoots a polymer frame pistol. The old non-removable grips were too slippery for me so I put a Hogue HandALL Universal Full Size Grip Sleeve on it. Problem solved. Checkering would be a more elegant solution but cost a lot more to get done than slipping on the Hague HandALL. I'll still consider getting it done when I have more money.

That's got to be cheaper than milling out the grip frame to accept 1911 grips, but now that I think of it, my laser-engraved grim reaper grips would really look cool on it. They were a limited run and the computer programming for the laser was immediately destroyed at the end of the run so they wouldn't be duplicated. Does anyone know where I can get my old 22/45 modified to take 1911 grips? I know someone was doing that before the MK III and MK IV came out.
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: RIMFIRE and STEEL CHALLENGE
« Reply #15 on: Today at 06:54:38 AM »

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk