2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA

[Neon Knight Anubis]

How difficult is it to cough up a piece of paper? If he was born in Hawaii what does he have to hide?

[Teresa Heilevang]

My point exactly...
It isn't hard. UNLESS you are hiding something........

[tt11758]

My point exactly...
It isn't hard. UNLESS you are hiding something........

Of course he's hiding something, but it matters not, since as Messiah, His Holiness King Barack Hussein Obama I is ABOVE the Constitution of the United States.  Nobody that matters will challenge him, and those that do will find themselves in the midst of a shitstorm of biblical proportions.

HOW DARE WE QUESTION "HIM"?

[WaltGraham]

My point exactly...
It isn't hard. UNLESS you are hiding something........

Can't hide those boots - nice

[ericire12]

HOW DARE WE QUESTION "HIM"?

Thats what Olbermann's (D) argument is about this subject:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vi9-Gz24iYo

[Sponsor]

[runstowin]

Yet more.    


WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Soldier questions eligibility, doubts president's authority
'As an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this'
Posted: February 23, 2009
9:35 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Soldier Scott Easterling

A U.S. soldier on active duty in Iraq has called President Obama an "impostor" in a statement in which he affirmed plans to join as plaintiff in a challenge to Obama's eligibility to be commander in chief.

The statement was publicized by California attorney Orly Taitz who, along with her DefendOurFreedom.us Foundation, is working on a series of legal cases seeking to uncover Obama's birth records and other documents that would reveal whether he meets the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

"As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States," wrote Scott Easterling in a "to-whom-it-may-concern" letter.

(Story continues below)

       
   

Obama "has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility," Easterling wrote. "In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so."

Taitz told WND she had advised Easterling to obtain legal counsel before making any statements regarding the commander-in-chief, but he insisted on moving forward. His contention is that as an active member of the U.S. military, he is required to follow orders from a sitting president, and he needs – on pain of court-martial – to know that Obama is eligible.

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89837

[tt11758]

Yet more.    


WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Soldier questions eligibility, doubts president's authority
'As an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this'
Posted: February 23, 2009
9:35 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Soldier Scott Easterling

A U.S. soldier on active duty in Iraq has called President Obama an "impostor" in a statement in which he affirmed plans to join as plaintiff in a challenge to Obama's eligibility to be commander in chief.

The statement was publicized by California attorney Orly Taitz who, along with her DefendOurFreedom.us Foundation, is working on a series of legal cases seeking to uncover Obama's birth records and other documents that would reveal whether he meets the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

"As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States," wrote Scott Easterling in a "to-whom-it-may-concern" letter.

(Story continues below)

       
   

Obama "has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility," Easterling wrote. "In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so."

Taitz told WND she had advised Easterling to obtain legal counsel before making any statements regarding the commander-in-chief, but he insisted on moving forward. His contention is that as an active member of the U.S. military, he is required to follow orders from a sitting president, and he needs – on pain of court-martial – to know that Obama is eligible.

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89837

Hopefully this soldier has career opportunities lined up after he's forced out of the military.

[fightingquaker13]

I'm sorry but I have to weigh in on this Lt. Easterling joining a suit to get rid of Obama. I know I'm new here, but this is unacceptable. First, this whole he's not an American thing has "grassy knoll" black helicopters written all over it. If he wasn't eligble do you seriousely think Hillary of all people, with her ex-president husband and all the power that entails, wouldn't have figured this out during the primary?

But thats not the point of the post. I'm writing as a former Army officer who is appalled by this yahoo Easterling. When I was a cadet in college I was very active politically, both in pro 2nd ammendment stuff (one of about 3 of us in D.C.) as well as the pro-choice movement. (As a good Libertarian, it seemed wise get them both coming and going). When I graduated and was comissioned however, I heeded the advice of our ROTC cadre commander, and changed my registration from Libertarian to Independent. He explained to us all, that the reason the US has never had a military dictator, was that the officer corps, from the start, recognized the idea of civilian control. He advised us not to vote in federal elections as our job is to execute policy, not make it. This idiot  Easterling didn't get the memo.

We do not get to choose which orders we follow or which commanders we odey. They point and we go. Its just that simple. Easterling is lucky I'm not in his chain of command. I would make a 19 year old private wish he'd been left as a wet spot on the sheet. A forty year old officer would be lucky to be able to resign his commision. This isn't about politics. I'd have done the same thing to someone saying Bush stole the 2000 election. It is about discipline, good order and morale, patriotism and most importantly the principle that once the American people have spoken, we in the military don't get to second guess them. This guy needs to be screwed to the wall

fightingquaker13

[2HOW]

http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/profiles/blogs/dr-taitzs-military-action

Until Mr. Obama releases a "vault copy" of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office - an impostor.
My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz's lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me to do this, but as an Offficer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this action

[1776 Rebel]

Fightingquaker13 welcome to the forum....

I am going to skip over the military chain of command stuff...As a civilian I will say that I don't see why BHO is NOT simply releasing his birth cert. Wouldn't it end all discussion after that? If we have documents on Clinton's penis and W's colon I think that a simple birth certificate shouldn't be so shocking to the Obama family. I wasn't there but I do have a question about who he was born to (parents listed) and where he was born. I think as a customer, so to say, I have a right to ask. Now if it does turn out that he was born in Kenya (as his relatives say) that raises another whole kettle of fish. It says to me that the country got screwed and hoodwinked.