What better way to "register" all firearms but to have the manufacturers be responsible for the database. Not only does that put the cost on them, but if they make a mistake, then the BATF can shut them down for violation of federal regulations!
Just read this section of the Brady proposals.
"Tracing of crime guns is often cumbersome and unsuccessful because ATF must make contact first with the manufacturer, then with the distributor and dealer to complete a trace." "ATF can streamline and significantly improve tracing by requiring dealers to report simple details about the sale of each gun to the manufacturer. This reporting requirement could also be applied to secondhand guns, which cannot now be traced because they have passed through unlicensed purchasers before being acquired and sold by the dealer."
So not only will the ATF have the NICs data, but just in case that becomes a sticky issue, they want to have the manufacturers maintain a database. AND combined with EVERY SALE TRANSFER has to go through a dealer, then in no time you have a national registry.
SO, here's the game. If they can't build gun registry out of NICS then they build it through the manufacturers. If they only get 50% of their proposals......we loose!
OH DID I MENTION: Brady doesn't think this requires a new law, but that ATF has the power to create a rule requiring this onerous record keeping!