Concealed Carry Permits Are Life Savers

[PegLeg45]

Does not matter which side you take.  If you take the "well atleast he can carry argument"  then you have screwed up the power of states.   If you take the "we will just stop issuing out of state CCWs"  then you have screwed thousands of people that can't get CCW in thier home state.   pick a side, we all lose.

I for one would rather see CA get rid of CCW then have its power removed by the federal goverment.( you can take that any way you like)  keeping the federal goverment out of the affiars of the states was a founding concept of this country.

The federal gubmint isn't trying to give or take away any states rights or powers with this proposed bill.
It's not even telling the states who can or can not issue a CCW license.
All the law would do is allow you to carry in any state IF you have a licence.
like ericire12 posted, it would work like a drivers license. If you have a Ga license, you can drive in any state as long as you abide by their traffic laws.

[tombogan03884]

The federal gubmint isn't trying to give or take away any states rights or powers with this proposed bill.
It's not even telling the states who can or can not issue a CCW license.
All the law would do is allow you to carry in any state IF you have a licence.
like ericire12 posted,
it would work like a drivers license. If you have a Ga license, you can drive in any state as long as you abide by their traffic laws.

I'm  sure TAB disapproves of that as well. It takes away the States right to say who may or may not use their roads. And driving is only a privilege, not a Constitutionally specified unalienable Right.

[ericire12]

I'm  sure TAB disapproves of that as well. It takes away the States right to say who may or may not use their roads. And driving is only a privilege, not a Constitutionally specified unalienable Right.

and it is an incredibly deadly liability for those private property owners who have a parking lot at their business 

[PegLeg45]

I'm  sure TAB disapproves of that as well. It takes away the States right to say who may or may not use their roads. And driving is only a privilege, not a Constitutionally specified unalienable Right.

I ain't THAT dumb....I was just using that as an example since it makes the most sense.   

   

[tombogan03884]

I ain't THAT dumb....I was just using that as an example since it makes the most sense.  

  

We're not saying YOUR argument is dumb.

[Sponsor]

[PegLeg45]

We're not saying YOUR argument is dumb.

I know.... I was just messing with you a little ....TAB would argue with a possum.   

[tombogan03884]

I know.... I was just messing with you a little ....TAB would argue with a possum.  

Probably lose that one to 

[TAB]

There are hundreds of diffrent kinds of driver lics in the US... States do not have to exepct all of them. 

Provisional and under age dls being the big two.   


I'd also like to point out federal law also states that if you can't get your DL state of residence, if you move out of state you can not get your DL.

[tombogan03884]

There are hundreds of diffrent kinds of driver lics in the US... States do not have to exepct all of them. 

Provisional and under age dls being the big two.  


I'd also like to point out federal law also states that if you can't get your DL state of residence, if you move out of state you can not get your DL.

How are your comments pertinent to this quote from the proposed bill ?

"a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm and is carrying a valid license or permit which is issued by a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm (other than a machinegun or destructive device) may carry in another State a concealed firearm (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b)."