Author Topic: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting  (Read 15478 times)

Marshal Halloway

  • Forum Administrator
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 28
EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« on: January 26, 2009, 02:47:21 PM »

EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting

As Michael Bane tells us in this episode, seems that most defense training deals with terms like “close quarter combat” or “defensive firearm use”. But our experts will tell you that the best defense is to always try and avoid any kind of violent confrontation. Mike Janich shows us how being aware and controlling our actions can be the safest way to avoid any possible conflicts that may otherwise turn violent.

And, if you are a concealed carry permit holders, we will demonstrate the proper way to present your firearm from concealment. Rob Pincus shows us how to practice using a firearm from a concealed carry perspective, and the best drills you can use to practice on your own at the range.

Airtimes: Wednesday, January 28, 2008
4:00PM, 7:30PM and 11:00PM
Rerun: Wednesday, April 29, 2009
http://www.downrange.tv/bestdefense/episode5.htm

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7217
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 827
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2009, 08:46:57 PM »
Good show.  Tough thing....walking away from someone who needs their behind kicked across the street.

The CCW training in Oklahoma really hammers home that CCW holders have an extra responsibility for avoidance.  I suspect the other states are similar.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

treesy

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2009, 09:28:35 PM »
Can anyone tell me where I can find the concealed weapon purse/handbag shown in this episode?  It's the first one I've seen that I could see myself carrying. 

Thanks.

treesy

TexGun

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2009, 09:45:04 PM »
Texas CHL classes also emphasize avoidance.  They also spend a lot of time hammering into you the potential consequences of your actions, both mental and legal, whether you were in the right or not.

Another great show guys!

Rob Pincus

  • CO-HOST ON BEST DEFENSE
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
    • I.C.E. Training Company
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2009, 10:02:31 PM »
Treesy,

You can find a selection of purse holster options like the one in the episode from http://www.usgalco.com/HolsterP2.asp?CatalogID=149

-RJP

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #5 on: Today at 03:25:59 AM »

PoorSoulInJersey

  • Active Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2009, 10:07:10 PM »
Texas CHL classes also emphasize avoidance.  They also spend a lot of time hammering into you the potential consequences of your actions, both mental and legal, whether you were in the right or not.

As well they should. Too many people who I've met think that a gun makes them able to act tougher since they can now "back it up". I can only imagine the legal issues (how many years in jail) of picking a fight when you are carrying a gun....
-Tom

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2009, 10:15:54 PM »
NH law stipulates that, to paraphrase, ;D If you were running your mouth and instigated a situation you have to take your a$$ whooping AND that applies IN YOUR OWN HOME". While NH law states you have no obligation to retreat in your home, it also states that use of deadly force in an argument/ altercation that YOU initiated you will be charged .
However, if you come across a Sexual assault in progress, you can legally go over and shoot the attacker in the back of the head and nothing will be said.

TexGun

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2009, 10:30:36 PM »
As well they should. Too many people who I've met think that a gun makes them able to act tougher since they can now "back it up". I can only imagine the legal issues (how many years in jail) of picking a fight when you are carrying a gun....

I guess I wasn't clear that "hammering" home the consequesnces is a positive approach IMHO.  Lots of really good examples and case studies. (I got interrupted by the wife.  Imagine that!)

Rastus

  • Mindlessness Fuels Tyranny
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7217
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 827
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2009, 06:09:19 AM »
As well they should. Too many people who I've met think that a gun makes them able to act tougher since they can now "back it up". <snip>..

I agree with this.  Mostly some police officers, including some I've known since we were children together.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
-William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)
                                                                                                                               Avoid subjugation, join the NRA!

PoorSoulInJersey

  • Active Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: EPISODE #5: Deescalation and Boundary Setting
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2009, 07:09:01 AM »
I guess I wasn't clear that "hammering" home the consequesnces is a positive approach IMHO.  Lots of really good examples and case studies. (I got interrupted by the wife.  Imagine that!)

I think you got your point across. I was trying to agree with you :-)
-Tom

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk